تأثیر وجود شاخصهای فراگفتمانی بر درک مطلب خواندن انگلیسی دانش آموزان دبیرستانی

کرمی، جهانگیر؛ عباسی، زینب و زکی یی، علی ( 1392 ). تأثیر آموزش آگاهی واج شناختی بر سرعت،
.38-53 ،(3) دقت و درک مطلب دانش آموزان نارساخوان. فص لنام هی ناتوان یهای یادگیری، 2
Abdi, R., Tavangar, M., & Tavakoli, M. (2010). The cooperative principle in discourse
communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse. Journal of
Pragmatics, 42, 1669-1679.
Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bernhardt, E. (1991). Reading development in second language: heoretical, empirical, and
classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Camiciottoli, B. (2003). Metadiscourse and ESP reading comprehension: An
exploratorystudy. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(1), 15–33.
Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly,
19, 727–752.
Carrel, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL
reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 647-678.
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York:
Peter Lang Publishers.
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive
writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written
Communication, 10, 39-71.
Grabe, W. (1988). Reassessing the term ‘interactive’. In Carrell, P. L., Devine, J. & Eskey,
D. E. (eds.) (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading.
Cambridge:CUP.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. (2001). Reading for academic purposes: Guidelines for the
ESL/EFL teacher. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign
language (3rd ed.) (pp. 187–205). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London:
Edward Arnold.
Hashemi, M. R., & Khodabakhshzadeh, H. (2012). The effect of metadiscourse of EFL
learners' reading comprehension. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 2(3),
1-16.
Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse.
Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 437–455.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied
Linguistics, 25(2), 156–157.
Intaraprawat, P., & Steffensen, M. (1995). The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL
essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 263–272.
Kumpf, E. P. (2000). Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical
Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 401–424.
Lynch, B., & Hudson, T. (1991). EST Reading. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching
English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed.) (pp. 216–232). Boston: Heinle &
Heinle Publishers.
Nunan, D. (2001). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle
Publishers.
Parvaresh, V., & Nemati, M. (2008). Metadiscourse and reading comprehension: The
effects of language and proficiency. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching,
5, 220–239.
Richards, P. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Teaching reading. In J. C. Richards & W. A.
Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice
(pp. 273–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simin, S., & Tavangar, M. (2009). Metadiscourse knowledge and use in Iranian EFL
writing. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 1(11), 230–255.
Tavakoli, M, Dabaghi, A., & Khorvash, Z. (2010). The Effect of Metadiscourse Awareness
on L2 Reading Comprehension: A Case of Iranian EFL Learners. English Language
Teaching, 3(1), 92-102.
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College
Composition and Communication, 36, 82–93.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In G. Ward & L.R. Horn (Eds.),
Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.