آمار

تعداد نشریات32
تعداد شماره‌ها497
تعداد مقالات4,422
تعداد مشاهده مقاله7,631,363
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله5,133,847
Mohammad hosseini Mirzaei, Shahla, Rabiee, Abdorreza, Taghipour Boroujeni, Samad. (1405). Coordinated Distributed Security Constrained Unit Commitment with Frequency Deviation Control for High Renewable Penetration Low Inertia Power Grids. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(4), 267-274. doi: 10.22098/joape.2025.15739.2210
Shahla Mohammad hosseini Mirzaei; Abdorreza Rabiee; Samad Taghipour Boroujeni. "Coordinated Distributed Security Constrained Unit Commitment with Frequency Deviation Control for High Renewable Penetration Low Inertia Power Grids". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 4, 1405, 267-274. doi: 10.22098/joape.2025.15739.2210
Mohammad hosseini Mirzaei, Shahla, Rabiee, Abdorreza, Taghipour Boroujeni, Samad. (1405). 'Coordinated Distributed Security Constrained Unit Commitment with Frequency Deviation Control for High Renewable Penetration Low Inertia Power Grids', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(4), pp. 267-274. doi: 10.22098/joape.2025.15739.2210
Mohammad hosseini Mirzaei, Shahla, Rabiee, Abdorreza, Taghipour Boroujeni, Samad. Coordinated Distributed Security Constrained Unit Commitment with Frequency Deviation Control for High Renewable Penetration Low Inertia Power Grids. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1405; 14(4): 267-274. doi: 10.22098/joape.2025.15739.2210

Coordinated Distributed Security Constrained Unit Commitment with Frequency Deviation Control for High Renewable Penetration Low Inertia Power Grids

Journal of Operation and Automation in Power Engineering
مقاله 4، دوره 14، شماره 4، اسفند 2026، صفحه 267-274    اصل مقاله (1.14 M)
نوع مقاله: Research paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22098/joape.2025.15739.2210
نویسندگان
Shahla Mohammad hosseini Mirzaei؛ Abdorreza Rabiee* ؛ Samad Taghipour Boroujeni
Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
چکیده
    Among different renewable resources, wind power and solar photovoltaics (PVs) have the most desirable technical and economic prospects. However, the significant penetration of such low inertia power plants in power grids causes a decrease in the system's total inertia and thereby leads to a decrease in system frequency deviation (SFD) more than the acceptable range. This paper presents a distributed (D-SCUC) problem in which system frequency deviation is considered as a constraint to prevent system frequency deviation more than the pre-determined level. With the proposed method, the system partitions into several areas wherein a SCUC problem is separately solved, and the analytical target cascading (ATC) method is used to coordinate these sub-systems. To avoid the masking effect, a modified penalty function is used. A simple 6-bus network and the modified IEEE RTS 24-bus test system are used as the case study. The results show the effectiveness of the D-SCUC technique, especially in large power systems, and therefore, the system operator's concern about the system frequency is relieved.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Renewable energy sources؛ wind power؛ solar PVs؛ D-SCUC problem؛ low inertia؛ analytical target cascading؛ system frequency deviation
مراجع
  1. P. Bendotti, P. Fouilhoux, and C. Rottner, “On the complexity of the unit commitment problem,” Ann. Oper. Res., vol. 274, no. 1, pp. 119–130, 2019.
  2. M. Tuo and X. Li, “Security-constrained unit commitment considering locational frequency stability in low-inertia power grids,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 4134–4147, 2022.
  3. C. C. A. Rajan and M. R. Mohan, “An evolutionary programming-based tabu search method for solving the unit commitment problem,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 577–585, 2004.
  4. D. N. Simopoulos, S. D. Kavatza, and C. D. Vournas, “Unit commitment by an enhanced simulated annealing algorithm,” in 2006 IEEE PES Power Syst. Conf. Expo., pp. 193–201, 2006.
  5. V. B. A. Kasangaki, H. M. Sendaula, and S. K. Biswas, “Stochastic Hopfield artificial neural network for electric power production costing,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1525–1533, 1995.
  6. K. S. Swarup and S. Yamashiro, “Unit commitment solution methodology using genetic algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 87–91, 2002.
  7. I. G. Damousis, A. G. Bakirtzis, and P. S. Dokopoulos, “A solution to the unit-commitment problem using integer-coded genetic algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1165–1172, 2004.
  8. I. J. Raglend, C. Raghuveer, G. R. Avinash, N. P. Padhy, and D. P. Kothari, “Solution to profit-based unit commitment problem using particle swarm optimization,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1247–1256, 2010.
  9. A. Kargarian, Y. Fu, and Z. Li, “Distributed security-constrained unit commitment for large-scale power systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1925–1936, 2015.
  10. S. Boyd, N. Parikh, E. Chu, B. Peleato, and J. Eckstein, “Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers,” Found. Trends Mach. Learn., vol. 3, pp. 1–122, 2011.
  11. T. Erseghe, “Distributed optimal power flow using ADMM,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2370–2380, 2014.
  12. B. H. Kim and R. Baldick, “Coarse-grained distributed optimal power flow,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 932–939, 1997.
  13. P. Li and J. Hu, “An ADMM-based distributed finite-time algorithm for economic dispatch problems,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 30969–30976, 2018.
  14. International Renewable Energy Agency, “Renewable capacity statistics 2024.” Abu Dhabi, 2024.
  15. B. Kroposki et al., “Achieving a 100% renewable grid: Operating electric power systems with extremely high levels of variable renewable energy,” IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 61–73, 2017.
  16. F. D. Galiana, F. Bouffard, J. M. Arroyo, and J. F. Restrepo, “Scheduling and pricing of coupled energy and primary, secondary, and tertiary reserves,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 93, no. 11, pp. 1970–1983, 2005.
  17. J. W. O’Sullivan and M. J. O’Malley, “Economic dispatch of a small utility with a frequency-based reserve policy,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1648–1653, 1996.
  18. J. F. Restrepo and F. D. Galiana, “Unit commitment with primary frequency regulation constraints,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1836–1842, 2005.
  19. H. Ahmadi and H. Ghasemi, “Security-constrained unit commitment with linearized system frequency limit constraints,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1536–1545, 2014.
  20. M. Shahidehpour, H. Yamin, and Z. Li, Market Operations in Electric Power Systems: Forecasting, Scheduling, and Risk Management. Wiley, 2003.
  21. P. M. Anderson and M. Mirheydar, “A low-order system frequency response model,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 720–729, 1990.
  22. M. Brito, E. Gil, and I. Calle, “Unit commitment with primary frequency control requirements for low-inertia systems,” in 2018 IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meet., pp. 1–5, 2018.
  23. F. Pan, J. T. Holzer, Y. Chen, and A. Veeramany, “Integrated solution techniques for security constrained unit commitment problem.” Google Patents, 2024.
  24. F. Yong, M. Shahidehpour, and L. Zuyi, “Security-constrained unit commitment with AC constraints,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1001–1013, 2005.
  25. A. J. Conejo, M. Carrión, and J. M. Morales, Decision Making Under Uncertainty in Electricity Markets. Springer US, 2010.
  26. C. Grigg et al., “The IEEE reliability test system-1996. a report prepared by the reliability test system task force of the application of probability methods subcommittee,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1010–1020, 1999.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 278
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 514


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب