Integration of conceptual hydrological and machine learning models via output augmentation for enhanced streamflow prediction

Mulu, Bewketu; Zimale, Fasikaw; Kebede, Mulugeta

doi:10.22098/mmws.2025.18128.1648

دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

تعداد نشریات	31
تعداد شماره‌ها	471
تعداد مقالات	4,152
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	6,934,176
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	4,680,041

	Integration of conceptual hydrological and machine learning models via output augmentation for enhanced streamflow prediction
مدل سازی و مدیریت آب و خاک
مقاله 7، دوره 5، شماره 4، 1404، صفحه 95-115 اصل مقاله (1.57 M)
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22098/mmws.2025.18128.1648
نویسندگان
Bewketu Mulu^* ¹؛ Fasikaw Zimale²؛ Mulugeta Kebede³
¹PhD Candidate in Geoinformation and Earth Observation for Hydrology, Faculty of Meteorology and Hydrology, Arba Minch Water Technology Institute, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
²Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil and Water Resources Engineering, Bahir Dar Institute of Technology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
³Assistant Professor, Institute of Geophysics, Space Science, and Astronomy, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Unit, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
چکیده
Quantifying water resources is essential for developing evidence-based management strategies. Hydrological models play a great role in estimating streamflow, particularly in regions with limited flow measurement infrastructure. This study evaluates the integration of the GR4J conceptual hydrological model with Machine Learning (ML) techniques, Random Forest (RF), Extreme Learning Machine (ELM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to improve daily streamflow prediction in the Bilate River watershed. Though GR4J captures general hydrological trends, its limitations in modeling nonlinear dynamics and extreme flows necessitate advanced approaches by augmenting GR4J’s simulated outputs with climate input features to train the ML models. The integrated models GR4J-RF, GR4J-ELM, GR4J-XGB, and GR4J-LSTM combine GR4J’s physical interpretability with ML’s capability to capture complex and nonlinear relationships, addressing the shortcomings of both the conceptual and ML methods. Findings of the study demonstrate significant improvements over standalone GR4J, with GR4J-LSTM and GR4J-XGB achieving the highest test performance (NSE of 0.77, KGE of up to 0.86), GR4J-RF excelling in training fit (train NSE of 0.87) with gaps in generalization, and GR4J-ELM offering computational efficiency with comparable performance (test NSE of 0.74). These findings highlight the potential of integrated modeling to improve streamflow prediction in data-limited regions, supporting applications such as flood prediction and drought monitoring.
کلیدواژه‌ها
GR4J؛ Conceptual hydrological model؛ Machine Learning؛ Integrated model؛ Lake Abaya-Chamo Basin

مراجع
References Adane, G. B., Hirpa, B. A., Lim, C. H., & Lee, W. K. (2021). Evaluation and comparison of satellite-derived estimates of rainfall in the diverse climate and terrain of central and northeastern ethiopia. Remote Sensing, 13(7). doi: 10.3390/rs13071275 Adnan, R. M., Liang, Z., Trajkovic, S., Zounemat-Kermani, M., Li, B., & Kisi, O. (2019). Daily streamflow prediction using optimally pruned extreme learning machine. Journal of Hydrology, 577, 123981. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123981 Al-Mukhtar, M., & Al-Yaseen, F. (2019). Modeling water quality parameters using data-driven models, a case study Abu-Ziriq marsh in south of Iraq. Hydrology, 6(1). doi: 10.3390/hydrology6010021 Anshuman, A., Kunnath-Poovakka, A., & Eldho, T. I. (2021). Performance evaluation of conceptual rainfall-runoff models GR4J and AWBM. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 27(4), 365–374. doi: 10.1080/09715010.2018.1556124 Armstrong, W., Arsenault, R., Martel, J., Troin, M., Sabzipour, B., Brissette, F., & Mai, J. (2025). Improving multi-model ensemble ﬆreamflow forecaﬆs by combining lumped , diﬆributed and deep learning hydrological models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 0(0). doi: 10.1080/02626667.2025.2471430 Asgari, E., Mostafazadeh, R., & Talebi Khiavi, H. (2025). Projecting the Climate Change Impact on Water Yield in a Cold Mountainous Watershed, Ardabil. Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 50(4), 165–177. doi: 10.22059/JESPHYS.2025.375570.1007601 Ayalew, A. D., Wagner, P. D., Tigabu, T. B., Sahlu, D., & Fohrer, N. (2023). Hydrological responses to land use and land cover change and climate dynamics in the Rift Valley Lakes Basin, Ethiopia. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 14(8), 2788–2807. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2023.138 Bargam, B., Boudhar, A., Kinnard, C., Bouamri, H., Nifa, K., & Chehbouni, A. (2024). Evaluation of the support vector regression (SVR) and the random forest (RF) models accuracy for streamflow prediction under a data-scarce basin in Morocco. Discover Applied Sciences, 6(6). doi: 10.1007/s42452-024-05994-z Bartz-beielstein, E. B. T., & Zaefferer, M. (2023). Hyperparameter Tuning for Machine and Deep Learning with R. In Hyperparameter Tuning for Machine and Deep Learning with R. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-5170-1 Beza, M., Tatek, E., Chala, M., & Moshe, A. (2024). Watershed hydrological responses to land use land cover changes at Bilata watershed, Rift Valley Basin, southern Ethiopia. Water Practice and Technology, 19(4), 1455–1472. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2024.066 Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forest. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324 Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost : A Scalable Tree Boosting System. 785–794. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785 Clark, M. P., Bierkens, M. F. P., Samaniego, L., Woods, R. A., Uijlenhoet, R., Bennett, K. E., … Peters-lidard, C. D. (2017). The evolution of process-based hydrologic models : historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism. (1969), 3427–3440. Cutler, A., Cutler, D. R., & Stevens, J. R. (2012). Random Forests. In C. Zhang & Y. Ma (Eds.), Ensemble Machine Learning Methods and Applications (pp. 157–175). Springer. Dambré, K., Domiho, K. J., Faya, L., Vodounon, T., Sourou, H., & Ernest, A. (2024). Rain-Flow Modelling Using the GR4J Model for Flood Risk Management in the Oti Watershed ( Togo ). 213–230. doi: 10.4236/ojmh.2024.144012 Darota, F. D., Borko, H. B., Adinew, C. D., & Edamo, M. L. (2024). Predicting sediment yield and locating hotspot areas in the Hamesa watershed of Ethiopia for effective watershed management. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 15(4), 1855–1868. doi: 10.2166/wcc.2024.648 Dessie, M., Verhoest, N. E. C., Pauwels, V. R. N., Admasu, T., Poesen, J., Adgo, E., … Nyssen, J. (2014). Analyzing runoff processes through conceptual hydrological modeling in the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(12), 5149–5167. doi: 10.5194/hess-18-5149-2014 Digital Earth Africa. (2025). Digital Earth Africa Sandbox. Dinku, T., Funk, C., Peterson, P., Maidment, R., Tadesse, T., Gadain, H., & Ceccato, P. (2018). Validation of the CHIRPS satellite rainfall estimates over eastern Africa. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 144(November 2017), 292–312. doi: 10.1002/qj.3244 Duc, L., & Sawada, Y. (2023). A signal-processing-based interpretation of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 27(9), 1827–1839. doi: 10.5194/hess-27-1827-2023 Emerton, R., Zsoter, E., Arnal, L., Cloke, H. L., Muraro, D., Prudhomme, C., … Pappenberger, F. (2018). Developing a global operational seasonal hydro-meteorological forecasting system : GloFAS-Seasonal v1 . 0. 3327–3346. Enku, T., & Melesse, A. M. (2013). A simple temperature method for the estimation of evapotranspiration. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2274(November 2008), 2267–2274. doi: doi: 10.1002/hyp.9844 Fowler, K., Knoben, W., Peel, M., & Peterson, T. (2020). Many Commonly Used Rainfall ‐ Runoff Models Lack Long , Slow Dynamics : Implications for Runoff Projections Water Resources Research. 1–27. doi: 10.1029/2019WR025286 Gers, F. A., & Cummins, F. (2000). Learning to Forget: Continual Prediction with LSTM. Choice Reviews Online, 27(09), 27-5238-27–5238. doi: 10.5860/choice.27-5238 Graves, A., Jaitly, N., & Mohamed, A. R. (2013). Hybrid speech recognition with Deep Bidirectional LSTM. 2013 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, ASRU 2013 - Proceedings, 273–278. doi: 10.1109/ASRU.2013.6707742 Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutnik, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2017). LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 28(10), 2222–2232. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582924 Hah, D., Quilty, J. M., & Sikorska-senoner, A. E. (2022). Ensemble and stochastic conceptual data-driven approaches for improving streamflow simulations : Exploring different hydrological and data-driven models and a diagnostic tool. Environmental Modelling and Software, 157(July), 105474. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105474 Hamzah, F. B., Hamzah, F. M., Razali, S. F. M., & Samad, H. (2021). A comparison of multiple imputation methods for recovering missing data in hydrological studies. Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), 7(9), 1608–1619. doi: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091747 Hao, R., & Bai, Z. (2023). Comparative Study for Daily Streamflow Simulation with Different Machine Learning Methods. Water (Switzerland), 15(6). doi: 10.3390/w15061179 He, S., Gu, L., Tian, J., Deng, L., Yin, J., Liao, Z., … Hui, Y. (2021). Machine learning improvement of streamflow simulation by utilizing remote sensing data and potential application in guiding reservoir operation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(7). doi: 10.3390/su13073645 Huang, G. Bin, Wang, D. H., & Lan, Y. (2011). Extreme learning machines: A survey. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2(2), 107–122. doi: 10.1007/s13042-011-0019-y Huang, G. Bin, Zhu, Q. Y., & Siew, C. K. (2006). Extreme learning machine: Theory and applications. Neurocomputing, 70(1–3), 489–501. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 Humphrey, G. B., Gibbs, M. S., Dandy, G. C., & Maier, H. R. (2016). A hybrid approach to monthly streamflow forecasting: Integrating hydrological model outputs into a Bayesian artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrology, 540, 623–640. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.026 Ibrahim, A. H., Molla, D. D., & Lohani, T. K. (2024). Performance evaluation of satellite-based rainfall estimates for hydrological modeling over Bilate river basin, Ethiopia. World Journal of Engineering, 21(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1108/WJE-03-2022-0106 Janjić, J., & Tadić, L. (2023). Fields of Application of SWAT Hydrological Model—A Review. Earth (Switzerland), 4(2), 331–344. doi: 10.3390/earth4020018 Kapoor, A., Pathiraja, S., Marshall, L., & Chandra, R. (2023). DeepGR4J: A deep learning hybridization approach for conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling. Environmental Modelling and Software, 169(June), 105831. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105831 Khandelwal, A., Xu, S., Li, X., Jia, X., Stienbach, M., Duffy, C., … Kumar, V. (2020). Physics Guided Machine Learning Methods for Hydrology. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.02854 Kodja, D. J., Mahé, G., Amoussou, E., Boko, M., Kodja, D. J., Mahé, G., … Paturel, J. E. (2023). Assessment of the Performance of Rainfall-Runoff Model GR4J to Simulate Streamflow in Ouémé Watershed at Bonou ’ s outlet ( West Africa To cite this version : HAL Id : hal-04133007 Assessment of the Performance of Rainfall-Runoff Model GR4J to Simulate St. 0–18. doi: 10.20944/preprints201803.0090.v1 Konapala, G., Kao, S., Painter, S. L., & Lu, D. (2020). Machine learning assisted hybrid models can improve streamflow simulation in diverse catchments across the conterminous US OPEN ACCESS Machine learning assisted hybrid models can improve streamflow simulation in diverse catchments across the conterminous . Kratzert, F., Klotz, D., Brenner, C., Schulz, K., & Herrnegger, M. (2018). Rainfall-runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(11), 6005–6022. doi: 10.5194/hess-22-6005-2018 Kumanlioglu, A. A., & Fistikoglu, O. (2019). Performance Enhancement of a Conceptual Hydrological Model by Integrating Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 24(11), 04019047. doi: 10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0001850 Kunnath-Poovakka, A., & Eldho, T. I. (2019). A comparative study of conceptual rainfall-runoff models GR4J, AWBM and Sacramento at catchments in the upper Godavari river basin, India. Journal of Earth System Science, 128(2), 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s12040-018-1055-8 Kwak, J., Han, H., Kim, S., & Kim, H. S. (2022). Is the deep-learning technique a completely alternative for the hydrological model?: A case study on Hyeongsan River Basin, Korea. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 36(6), 1615–1629. doi: 10.1007/s00477-021-02094-x Le, X. H., Nguyen, D. H., Jung, S., Yeon, M., & Lee, G. (2021). Comparison of Deep Learning Techniques for River Streamflow Forecasting. IEEE Access, 9, 71805–71820. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3077703 Li, Xia, Xu, W., Ren, M., Jiang, Y., & Fu, G. (2022). Hybrid CNN-LSTM models for river flow prediction. Water Supply, 22(5), 4902–4920. doi: 10.2166/ws.2022.170 Li, Xue, Sha, J., & Wang, Z. L. (2019). Comparison of daily streamflow forecasts using extreme learning machines and the random forest method. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64(15), 1857–1866. doi: 10.1080/02626667.2019.1680846 Liu, D., Jiang, W., Mu, L., & Wang, S. (2020). Streamflow Prediction Using Deep Learning Neural Network: Case Study of Yangtze River. IEEE Access, 8, 90069–90086. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2993874 Liu, J., Yuan, X., Zeng, J., Jiao, Y., Li, Y., Zhong, L., & Yao, L. (2022). Ensemble streamflow forecasting over a cascade reservoir catchment with integrated hydrometeorological modeling and machine learning. 265–278. Liu, S., Wang, J., Wang, H., & Wu, Y. (2022). Post-processing of hydrological model simulations using the convolutional neural network and support vector regression. Hydrology Research, 53(4), 605–621. doi: 10.2166/nh.2022.004 Loon, A. F. Van, Stahl, K., Baldassarre, G. Di, Clark, J., Rangecroft, S., Wanders, N., … Uijlenhoet, R. (2016). Drought in a human-modified world : reframing drought definitions , understanding , and analysis approaches. (1), 3631–3650. doi: 10.5194/hess-20-3631-2016 Ma, J., Sun, W., Yang, G., & Zhang, D. (2018). Hydrological Analysis Using Satellite Remote Sensing Big Data and CREST Model. IEEE Access, 6, 9006–9016. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2810252 Mada, Z. M., & Nannawo, A. S. (2023). Enhancing Understanding of Hydrologic Processes in the Shafe Watershed, Ethiopia. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2023. doi: 10.1155/2023/5577851 Mei, Z., Peng, T., Chen, L., Singh, V. P., Yi, B., Leng, Z., … Xie, T. (2024). Coupling SWAT and LSTM for Improving Daily Streamflow Simulation in a Humid and Semi-humid River Basin. Water Resources Management, 397–418. doi: 10.1007/s11269-024-03975-w Mohammadi, B., Safari, M. J. S., & Vazifehkhah, S. (2022). IHACRES, GR4J and MISD-based multi conceptual-machine learning approach for rainfall-runoff modeling. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16215-1 Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(3), 885–900. Nannawo, A. S., Lohani, T. K., Eshete, A. A., & Ayana, M. T. (2022). Evaluating the dynamics of hydroclimate and streamflow for data-scarce areas using MIKE11-NAM model in Bilate river basin, Ethiopia. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 8(4), 4563–4578. doi: 10.1007/s40808-022-01455-x Napiorkowski, J. J., Piotrowski, A. P., Karamuz, E., & Senbeta, T. B. (2023). Calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models by selected differential evolution and particle swarm optimization variants. Acta Geophysica, 71(5), 2325–2338. doi: 10.1007/s11600-022-00988-0 Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River Flow Forecasting Through Conceptual Models - Part I - A Discussion of Principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(1970), 282–290. Nearing, G. S., Kratzert, F., Sampson, A. K., Pelissier, C. S., Klotz, D., Frame, J. M., … Gupta, H. V. (2020). What Role Does Hydrological Science Play in the Age of Machine Learning ? Water Resources Research. (2019). doi: 10.1029/2020WR028091 Nguyen, N. Y., Anh, T. N., Nguyen, H. D., & Dang, D. K. (2024). Quantile mapping technique for enhancing satellite-derived precipitation data in hydrological modelling: a case study of the Lam River Basin, Vietnam. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 26(8), 2026–2044. doi: 10.2166/hydro.2024.225 Perrin, C., Michel, C., & Andréassian, V. (2003). Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 279(1–4), 275–289. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7 Sezen, C., Bezak, N., Bai, Y., & Šraj, M. (2019). Hydrological modelling of karst catchment using lumped conceptual and data mining models. Journal of Hydrology, 576, 98–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.06.036 Sezen, C., & Partal, T. (2022). New hybrid GR6J-wavelet-based genetic algorithm-artificial neural network (GR6J-WGANN) conceptual-data-driven model approaches for daily rainfall–runoff modelling. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(20), 17231–17255. doi: 10.1007/s00521-022-07372-5 Shen, C., Laloy, E., Albert, A., Chang, F.-J., Elshorbagy, A., Ganguly, S., … Tsai, W.-P. (2018). HESS Opinions: Deep learning as a promising avenue toward knowledge discovery in water sciences. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, (April), 1–21. doi: 10.5194/hess-2018-168 Shen, C., Laloy, E., Elshorbagy, A., Albert, A., Bales, J., Chang, F. J., … Tsai, W. P. (2018). HESS Opinions: Incubating deep-learning-powered hydrologic science advances as a community. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(11), 5639–5656. doi: 10.5194/hess-22-5639-2018 Shi, P., Chen, C., Srinivasan, R., Zhang, X., Cai, T., Fang, X., … Li, Q. (2011). Evaluating the SWAT Model for Hydrological Modeling in the Xixian Watershed and a Comparison with the XAJ Model. Water Resources Management, 25(10), 2595–2612. doi: 10.1007/s11269-011-9828-8 Siami-Namini, S., Tavakoli, N., & Namin, A. S. (2019). The Performance of LSTM and BiLSTM in Forecasting Time Series. Proceedings - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2019, 3285–3292. doi: 10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9005997 Tao, H., Majeed, M., Abdulameer, H., Zounemat-, M., Heddam, S., Kim, S., … Falah, M. W. (2022). Neurocomputing Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models : A comprehensive review. Neurocomputing, 489, 271–308. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.03.014 Tian, Y., Xu, Y. P., Yang, Z., Wang, G., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Integration of a parsimonious hydrological model with recurrent neural networks for improved streamflow forecasting. Water (Switzerland), 10(11). doi: 10.3390/w10111655 Tyralis, H., & Papacharalampous, G. (2019). A Brief Review of Random Forests for Water Scientists and Practitioners and Their Recent History in Water Resources. Water. Wegayehu, E. B., & Muluneh, F. B. (2021). Multivariate Streamflow Simulation Using Hybrid Deep. 2021(1). Wegayehu, E. B., & Muluneh, F. B. (2022). Short-Term Daily Univariate Streamflow Forecasting Using Deep Learning Models. Advances in Meteorology, 2022. doi: 10.1155/2022/1860460 Woldemariam, Y. A., Woldesenbet, T. A., & Alamirew, T. (2025). Evaluation and projection of CMIP6 simulations of climate variables for the Rift Valley Lakes Basin, Ethiopia. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 156(2). doi: 10.1007/s00704-025-05356-8 Xiang, Z., Yan, J., & Demir, I. (2020). A Rainfall-Runoff Model With LSTM-Based Sequence-to-Sequence Learning. Water Resources Research, 56(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1029/2019WR025326 Yang, J., Chen, F., Long, A., Sun, H., He, C., & Liu, B. (2024). Runoff simulation of the Kaidu River Basin based on the GR4J-6 and GR4J-6-LSTM models. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 56, 102034. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.102034 Yaseen, Z. M., Jaafar, O., Deo, R. C., Kisi, O., Adamowski, J., Quilty, J., & El-Shafie, A. (2016). Stream-flow forecasting using extreme learning machines: A case study in a semi-arid region in Iraq. Journal of Hydrology, 542, 603–614. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.035 Zamani, M., Shrestha, N. K., Akhtar, T., Boston, T., & Daggupati, P. (2021). Advancing model calibration and uncertainty analysis of SWAT models using cloud computing infrastructure: LCC-SWAT. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 23(1), 1–15. doi: 10.2166/hydro.2020.066 Zhang, R., Zen, R., Xing, J., Arsa, D. M. S., Saha, A., & Bressan, S. (2020). Hydrological Process Surrogate Modelling and Simulation with Neural Networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 12085 LNAI, 449–461. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-47436-2_34 Zhang, Y., & Thorburn, P. J. (2022). Handling missing data in near real-time environmental monitoring : A system and a review of selected methods. Future Generation Computer Systems, 128, 63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2021.09.033
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 733 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 340

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

آمار

Integration of conceptual hydrological and machine learning models via output augmentation for enhanced streamflow prediction

References