
تعداد نشریات | 30 |
تعداد شمارهها | 426 |
تعداد مقالات | 3,753 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 5,903,543 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 4,095,378 |
شناسایی مولفههای اصلی دانشگاه دوسوتوان با رویکرد موازنه بین بهرهبرداری و اکتشاف | ||
رهبری آموزشی کاربردی | ||
مقاله 3، دوره 6، شماره 3، مهر 1404، صفحه 31-55 اصل مقاله (1.69 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22098/ael.2025.18042.1619 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
پوریا سردشت* 1؛ محمود ابوالقاسمی2؛ محمد قهرمانی2؛ فرنوش اعلامی3 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
2دانشیار دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
3استادیار دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
مقدمه و هدف: دانشگاهها در عصر حاضر جهت حفظ پویایی و پاسخگویی به تحولات، نیازمند رویکردهایی نوین مانند دوسوتوانی سازمانی هستند که بر بهرهبرداری از ظرفیتهای موجود و اکتشاف فرصتهای نو تمرکز دارد. این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی مولفههای اصلی دانشگاه دوسوتوان با رویکرد توازن میان بهرهبرداری و اکتشاف، در راستای ارتقاء مدیریت راهبردی در دانشگاههای جامع انجام شده است. روششناسی پژوهش: این پژوهش براساس هدف کاربردی و به علت تازگی موضوع با رویکرد کیفی و روش مطالعه موردی انجام شده است. موردِ مطالعه دانشگاههای جامع ایران بودهاند. جهت جمعآوری دادهها، به صورت هدفمند و با کمک تکنیک گلوله برفی با مدیران خبره آموزش و پژوهش دانشگاهی مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته انجام گرفت که پس از 14 مصاحبه اشباع نظری حاصل شد. تحلیل مصاحبهها با روش تحلیل مضمون انجام گرفت و تطبیق نتایج با یافتههای کتابخانهای، رواسازی و درصد پایایی بازآزمون و پایایی بین دو کدگذارِ قابل قبول بر اعتبار یافتهها صحه گذاشت. یافتهها: پس از تحلیل مضمون مصاحبهها، در بخش بهرهبرداری 6 مضمون اصلی (14 مضمون فرعی) شامل سیاستهای دانشگاهی، ساختارهای دانشگاهی، تعامل دانشگاه و صنعت، توسعه آموزش و پژوهش، مالی و بودجه، فرهنگ دانشگاهی و در بخش اکتشاف، 6 مضمون اصلی (12 مضمون فرعی) شامل نیازسنجی و آموزش، ساختار و فناوری آینده نگر، بودجه و منابع مالی، سیاست و فرهنگ نوآورانه، مدیریت استراتژیک، پژوهش و آیندهپژوهی استخراج گردید. همچنین 6 راهبرد جهت موازنه بین بهرهبرداری و اکتشاف در دانشگاه در قالب 2 مضمون اصلی 1)سیاست و ارزیابی و2) منابع و ساختار، معین و نتایج در قالب مدلی اکتشافی ارائه گردید بحث و نتیجهگیری: مدل دوسوتوانی دانشگاهی این پژوهش، راهکاری راهبردی جهت تلفیق بهرهبرداری عملیاتی و نوآوری آیندهنگر در مدیریت دانشگاههای جامع ایران است. این مدل با تأکید بر توازن بهرهبرداری–اکتشاف، مسیر توسعه در نسل پنجم دانشگاهها و طراحی راهبردهای بلندمدت پاسخگو به تحولات محیطی را فراهم میسازد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
بهرهبرداری؛ اکتشاف؛ دوسوتوانی؛ دوسوتوانی سازمانی؛ دانشگاه دوسوتوان | ||
مراجع | ||
Alavi, H., Hąbek, P. (2016). Optimizing outcome in the university-industry technology transfer projects. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 22(2), 94-100.10.2478/mspe-04-02-2016. [DOI: 10.12914/MSPE-04-02-2016] Ambos, T.C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., d'Este, P. (2008). When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1424-1447.. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00804.x] Bazan, C. (2019). From Lab Bench to Store Shelves: A Translational Research & Development Framework for Linking University Science and Engineering Research to Commercial Outcomes. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 53, 1-18.10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.05.001. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.05.001] Benner, M.J., & Tushman, M.L. (2003). “Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited”. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. [DOI: 10.5465/amr.2003.9416096] Beyhan, B., & Findik, D. (2018). Student and graduate entrepreneurship: Ambidextrous universities create more nascent entrepreneurs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1346-1374. [DOI: 10.1007/s10961-017-9590-z] Birkinshaw, J., & Gupta, K. (2013). Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 287-298. [DOI: 10.5465/amp.2012.0167] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa] Burgess, N., Strauss, K., Currie, G., & Wood, G. (2015). Organizational ambidexterity and the Hybrid Middle Manager: The case of patient safety in UK Hospitals. Human Resource Managemen, 54, 87–109. [DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21725] Carayannis, E.G. Campbell, D.F.J. (2019). Smart Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems. Switzerland: Springer, [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-01517-6_4] Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2019). Exploration and exploitation in the development of more entrepreneurial universities: A twisting learning path model of ambidexterity. Technological forecasting and social change, 141, 172-194. [DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.014] Chang, Y.-C., Yihsing, P., Martin, B. R., Chi, H.-R., & Tsai-Lin, T.-F. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity: A multilevel analysis. Technovation, 54 (August), 7–9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.006] Colombelli, A., De Marco, A., Paolucci, E., Ricci, R., & Scellato, G. (2021). University technology transfer and the evolution of regional specialization: the case of Turin. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(4), 933-960. [DOI: 10.1007/s10961-020-09801-w] Compagnucci, L., Spigarelli, F. (2020). The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 161. [DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284] Cordero P, L., & Ferreira, J. J. (2019). Absorptive capacity and organizational mechanisms: A systematic review and future directions. Review of International Business and Strategy, 29(1), 61-82. [https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-10-2018-0089] Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1763859] Drivas, K., Panagopoulos, A. (2016). Using the patent term changes in assessing the evolution of patent valuation from filing to maturity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(4), 528-546. 10.1108/EJIM-04-2015-0027. [https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2015-0027] Duncan, R. B. (1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The Management of Organization, 1, 167–188. [https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2515394] Ferreira, P., Klarner, P., & Raisch, S. (2016). Staying Agile in the Saddle: CEO Tenure, TMT characteristics, and organizational ambidexterity. in academy of management proceedings (vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 15877). academy of management. [https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.15877abstract] Forouhar, M., Forouhar, M., Gholami, S., Arghish, O. (2016). Identify and Rank the Barriers to Technology Transfer - Analytic Hierarchy Process. Modern Applied Science, 10(9), 142-152. 10.5539/mas.v10n9p142. [http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/mas.v10n9p142] García-Hurtado, D., Devece, C., Hoffmann, V. E., & Camargo-Vera, C. (2024). On entrepreneurial and ambidextrous universities. Comparative study in Ibero-American higher education institutions. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 100077. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2024.100077] García-Hurtado, D., Devece, C., Zegarra-Saldaña, P. E., & Crisanto-Pantoja, M. (2022). Ambidexterity in entrepreneurial universities and performance measurement systems. A literature review. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-22. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00795-5] Geisser, S. (1975). The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(350), 320-328. [https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865] Gianzina-Kassotaki, O. (2017). Leadership and ambidexterity: A multilevel analysis of the aerospace and defense organizations [Dissertation]. Warwick Business School. [https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/95904/1/WRAP_Theses_Gianzina-Kassotaki_2017.pdf] Gibson, C. B. & Birkinshaw, J. (2004.) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 47: 209– 216. [https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573] Harder, B.T., Benke, R.J. (2005). Transportation Technology Transfer: Successes, Challenges, and Needs, Vol. 355. Washington: Transportation Research Board. [https://doi.org/10.17226/13923] Hosseinzadeh Arablouiyekan R, Rahnavard F, Alinezhad A. (2024). Explaining the Dimensions and Components of Ambi/ tridexterity Universities in Iran. JMDP. 37(3), 81-118. [doi:10.61882/jmdp.37.3.81] (In Persian) Jansen, J. J. P., Vera, D. & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. LeadershipQuarterly 20 (1): 5-18. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008] Junni, P., Sarala, R., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299–312. [https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0015] Kane, G. C. & Alavi, M. (2007). Information technology and organizational learning: An Investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organization Science18 (5): 796-812. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0286] Kang, S. C., & Snell, S. A. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: a framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies, 46 (1), 65-92. [ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00776.x] Kassotaki, O. (2017). Ambidexterity and leadership: a multilevel analysis of the aerospace and defense organizations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick). [ https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/95904/] Kassotaki, O. (2022). Review of organizational ambidexterity research. Sage Open, 12(1), 21582440221082127. [https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082127] Kassotaki, O., Paroutis, S., & Morrell, K. (2019). Ambidexterity penetration across organizational levels in an aerospace and defense organization. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 366–385. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.06.002] Klofsten, M., Fayolle, M., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., Wright, M. (2019). The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change – Key strategic challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 149-158. [DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.004] Kolster, R. (2021). Structural ambidexterity in higher education: excellence education as a testing ground for educational innovations. European journal of higher education, 11(1), 64-81. [https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1850312] Kortmann, S. (2014). The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity-oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 666–684. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12151] Kusumastuti, R., Safitri, N., & Rusmaningsih, P. N. (2017). Towards Research University through Ambidexterity Practice: A Lecturer Perspective. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 20(2), 163-174. [download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id] Kusumastuti, R., Safitri, N., Firdaus, N., Setyowati, M. S., Sakapurnama, E., & Nurita, P. (2016). Ambidexterity learning process for exploration and exploitation: A model of hybrid ambidextrous university. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, (NovemberSpecialIssue), 232-237. [https://scholar.ui.ac.id/en/publications/ambidexterity-learning-process-for-exploration-and-exploitation-a] Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1228667] Lin, L.-H., & Ho, Y.-L. (2016). Institutional pressures and environmental performance in the flobal automotive industry: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Long Range Planning, 49(6), 764–775. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.010] Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Yan, L., & Veiga, J. F. (2006.) Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management 32 (5):646-672.[ https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712] March, J. G. (1991). "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning". Organization science, 2(1), 71-87. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2634940] Mason, C., Anderson, M., Kessl, T., Hruskova, M. (2020). Promoting student enterprise: Reflections on a university start-up programme. Local Economy, 35(1), 68-79. [DOI: 10.1177/0269094219894907] Mazurkiewicz, A., Poteralska, B. (2016). Barriers and challenges for technology transfer at R&D organisations. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited Reading, pp. 150-158. [DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.134] Meijer, L.L.J., Huijben, J.C.C.M., Van Boxstael, A., Romme, A.G.L. (2019). Barriers and drivers for technology commercialization by SMEs in the Dutch sustainable energy sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 114-126. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.050] Olk, P. (2020). Seeking ambidexterity in an increasingly turbulent environment: The case of the University of Denver’s Daniels College of Business. Journal of Management Inquiry,29(2), 134-138. [DOI: 10.1177/1056492619864639] Pohlmann, J. R., Duarte Ribeiro, J. L., & Marcon, A. (2022). Inbound and outbound strategies to overcome technology transfer barriers from university to industry: a compendium for technology transfer offices. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(6), 1166-1178. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2077719] Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). "Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators". Journal of Management, 34 (3), 375-409. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058] Ripkey, S.L. (2017). Organizational Change and Ambidexterity in Higher Education: A Case Study of Institutional Merger. [https://doi.org/10.1108/S0897-301620170000025008] Rowley, D. J. (1997). Strategic Change in Colleges and Universities: Planning to Survive and Prosper. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. JosseyBass Inc., 350 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104. [https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED406883] Schubert, T. (2009). Empirical observations on new public management to increase efficiency in public research—Boon or bane?. Research policy, 38(8), 1225-1234. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.007] Sengupta, A., & Ray, A. S. (2017). University research and knowledge transfer: A dynamic view of ambidexterity in british universities. Research Policy, 46(5), 881-897. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.03.008] Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Management, 46(5), 865–894. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x] Sliż, P., & Dobrowolska, E. (2023). The ambidextrous university concept: balancing exploitation and exploration in higher education. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie, (177). [DOI:10.29119/1641-3466.2023.177.34] Sliż, P., Siciński, J., Antonowicz, P., Bęben, R. (2022). The BPM Governance Supporting Factors and Implementation Barriers – The Experience of a Public University. In: A. Marrella, B. Weber (eds.), Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 436. Cham: Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_12] Smith, S. M., Séraphin, H., & Cripps, K. (2022). The responsible management education paradox: Applying the conceptual lens of Organisational Ambidexterity. In Business Schools, Leadership and the Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 11-30). Routledge. [DOI: 10.4324/9781003244905-3] Soares, J. L., dos Reis, D. R., da Cunha, J. C., & Neto, P. J. S. (2018). Organizational ambidexterity: a study in Brazilian higher education institutions. Journal of technology management & innovation, 13(3), 36-46. [http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242018000300036] Stone, M. (1974). Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111-147. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x] Tahar, S., Niemeyer, C., Boutellier, R. (2011). Transferral of business management concepts to universities as ambidextrous organisations. Tertiary Education and Management, 17(4), 289-308. 10.1080/13583883.2011.589536. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2011.589536] Thomas, E., Pugh, R., Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. L. (2023). Beyond ambidexterity: universities and their changing roles in driving regional development in challenging times. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-20. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09992-4] Todorovic, Z.W., McNaughton, R.B., Guild, P. (2011). ENTRE-U: An entrepreneurial orientation scale for universities. Technovation, 31(2-3), 128-137. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.009] Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary andrevolutionary change. California Management Review, 38 (4), 8–30. [https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852] Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1997). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Harvard Business Press. [https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=197100] Wilden, R., Hohberger, J., Devinney, T. M., & Lavie, D. (2018). Revisiting James March (1991): Whither exploration and exploitation? Strategic Organization, 16(4), 352–369. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018765031] Zand, M., shahtalebi, B., & nadi, M. A. (2023). Presenting a paradigm model of organizational ambidexterity in the Iranian public education system. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 14(4), 15-1. [DOI: 10.30495/jedu.2023.31143.6244] (In Persian) | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 276 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 32 |