آمار

تعداد نشریات26
تعداد شماره‌ها373
تعداد مقالات3,302
تعداد مشاهده مقاله4,894,156
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله3,350,436
Jafarnezhadgero, AmirAli, Eskandari, Shadi, Imani, Fariborz, Sheikhalizadeh, Hamed, Ashrafi, Neghar. (1402). Effect of Eight Weeks of Training on Artificial Grass, Natural Grass, and Synthetic Surface on Ankle Joint Co-Contraction during Running in Individuals with Over-Pronation. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 7(4), 25-38. doi: 10.22098/jast.2023.2882
AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero; Shadi Eskandari; Fariborz Imani; Hamed Sheikhalizadeh; Neghar Ashrafi. "Effect of Eight Weeks of Training on Artificial Grass, Natural Grass, and Synthetic Surface on Ankle Joint Co-Contraction during Running in Individuals with Over-Pronation". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 7, 4, 1402, 25-38. doi: 10.22098/jast.2023.2882
Jafarnezhadgero, AmirAli, Eskandari, Shadi, Imani, Fariborz, Sheikhalizadeh, Hamed, Ashrafi, Neghar. (1402). 'Effect of Eight Weeks of Training on Artificial Grass, Natural Grass, and Synthetic Surface on Ankle Joint Co-Contraction during Running in Individuals with Over-Pronation', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 7(4), pp. 25-38. doi: 10.22098/jast.2023.2882
Jafarnezhadgero, AmirAli, Eskandari, Shadi, Imani, Fariborz, Sheikhalizadeh, Hamed, Ashrafi, Neghar. Effect of Eight Weeks of Training on Artificial Grass, Natural Grass, and Synthetic Surface on Ankle Joint Co-Contraction during Running in Individuals with Over-Pronation. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 7(4): 25-38. doi: 10.22098/jast.2023.2882

Effect of Eight Weeks of Training on Artificial Grass, Natural Grass, and Synthetic Surface on Ankle Joint Co-Contraction during Running in Individuals with Over-Pronation

Journal of Advanced Sport Technology
دوره 7، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 15، اسفند 2023، صفحه 25-38    اصل مقاله (669.34 K)
نوع مقاله: Original research papers
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22098/jast.2023.2882
نویسندگان
AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero* 1؛ Shadi Eskandari2؛ Fariborz Imani3؛ Hamed Sheikhalizadeh3؛ Neghar Ashrafi4
1Department of Sport Biomechanics, Faculty of Educational Science and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2Department of Sports Biomechanics, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
3Department of Sports Biomechanics, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
4Department of Sports Physiology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
چکیده
Running is one of the most popular physical activities in the world and is usually done on different surfaces. Different levels of running are associated with overuse injuries. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of eight weeks of training on artificial grass, natural grass, and synthetic surface on ankle joint co-contraction during running in individuals with over-pronation. This study was designed as a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Sixty participants aged 18–30 years with diagnosed excessive pronation of foot were randomly allocated into three intervention groups (natural grass, artificial grass, and synthetic surface) and a control group. Electromyography data during pre and posttest was collected using surface electromyography system. Results did not demonstrated and statistically significant between group differences in in directed and general ankle joint co-contraction (P>0.05). The results of the present study showed that the ankle joint co-contraction during training on three types of artificial grass, natural grass, and synthetic surfaces was not statistically different in individuals with over-pronation.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Over-pronation؛ Co-contraction؛ Electromyography؛ Running
مراجع
  1. Zhou W, Yin L, Jiang J, Zhang Y, Hsiao C-p, Chen Y, et al. Surface effects on kinematics, kinetics and stiffness of habitual rearfoot strikers during running. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(3):e0283323.
  2. Lorimer AV, Hume PA. Stiffness as a risk factor for Achilles tendon injury in running athletes. Sports Medicine. 2016;46:1921-38.
  3. Tessutti V, Trombini-Souza F, Ribeiro AP, Nunes AL, Sacco IdCN. In-shoe plantar pressure distribution during running on natural grass and asphalt in recreational runners. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2010;13(1):151-5.
  4. Wang L, Hong Y, Li J-X, Zhou J-H. Comparison of plantar loads during running on different overground surfaces. Research in Sports Medicine. 2012;20(2):75-85.
  5. Dolenec A, Štirn I, Strojnik V. Activation pattern of lower leg muscles in running on asphalt, gravel and grass. Collegium antropologicum. 2015;39(Supplement 1):167-72.
  6. Yamin N, Amran M, Basaruddin K, Salleh A, Rusli W. Ground reaction force response during running on different surface hardness. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 2017;12(7):2313-8.
  7. García-Pérez JA, Pérez-Soriano P, Llana S, Martínez-Nova A, Sánchez-Zuriaga D. Effect of overground vs treadmill running on plantar pressure: Influence of fatigue. Gait & Posture. 2013;38(4):929-33.
  8. Hardin EC, van den Bogert AJ, Hamill J. Kinematic adaptations during running: effects of footwear, surface, and duration. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(5):838-44.
  9. Hollis CR, Koldenhoven RM, Resch JE, Hertel J. Running biomechanics as measured by wearable sensors: effects of speed and surface. Sports biomechanics. 2019.
  10. Willwacher S, Fischer KM, Rohr E, Trudeau MB, Hamill J, Brüggemann G-P. Surface stiffness and footwear affect the loading stimulus for lower extremity muscles when running. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2022;36(1):82-9.
  11. Wannop J, Kowalchuk S, Esposito M, Stefanyshyn D. Influence of artificial turf surface stiffness on athlete performance. Life. 2020;10(12):340.
  12. Fleming P. Artificial turf systems for sport surfaces: current knowledge and research needs. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology. 2011;225(2):43-63.
  13. Stanitski CL, McMaster JH, Ferguson RJ. Synthetic turf and grass: a comparative study. The Journal of sports medicine. 1974;2(1):22-6.
  14. Kerdok AE, Biewener AA, McMahon TA, Weyand PG, Herr HM. Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnesses. Journal of applied physiology. 2002.
  15. Sanders RH, Allen JB. Changes in net joint torques during accomodation to change in surface compliance in a drop jumping task. Human movement science. 1993;12(3):299-326.
  16. Zanetti EM, Bignardi C, Franceschini G, Audenino AL. Amateur football pitches: mechanical properties of the natural ground and of different artificial turf infills and their biomechanical implications. Journal of sports sciences. 2013;31(7):767-78.
  17. Charalambous L, und Wilkau HCvL, Potthast W, Irwin G. The effects of artificial surface temperature on mechanical properties and player kinematics during landing and acceleration. Journal of sport and health science. 2016;5(3):355-60.
  18. Dixon S, Batt M, Collop A. Artificial playing surfaces research: a review of medical, engineering and biomechanical aspects. International journal of sports medicine. 1999;20(04):209-18.
  19. Yasamin AA, Heidar S, Mohammad HA. The effects of artificial turf on the performance of soccer players and evaluating the risk factors compared to natural grass. Journal of Neurological Research and Therapy. 2017;2(2):1-16.
  20. Willems TM, Witvrouw E, De Cock A, De Clercq D. Gait-related risk factors for exercise-related lower-leg pain during shod running. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2007;39(2):330-9.
  21. Fatollahi A, Jafarnezhadgero AA. Effect of long-term training on sand on co-contraction of ankle joint in individuals with pronated feet. The Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. 2021;29(4):3669-80.
  22. Fatollahi A, Jafarnezhadgero AA, Alihosseini S. Effect of sand surface training on directed and general co-contraction of ankle joint muscles during running. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2021;10(3):458-69.
  23. Farahpour N, Jafarnezhad A, Damavandi M, Bakhtiari A, Allard P. Gait ground reaction force characteristics of low back pain patients with pronated foot and able-bodied individuals with and without foot pronation. J Biomech. 2016;49(9):1705-10.
  24. Farahpour N, Jafarnezhadgero A, Allard P, Majlesi M. Muscle activity and kinetics of lower limbs during walking in pronated feet individuals with and without low back pain. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2018;39:35-41.
  25. Gray EG, Basmajian JV. Electromyography and cinematography of leg and foot (“normal” and flat) during walking. The anatomical record. 1968;161(1):1-15.
  26. Feehery Jr RV. The biomechanics of running on different surfaces. Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery. 1986;3(4):649-59.
  27. Bloom M. Judging a path by its cover: not all running surfaces are created equal. So we’ve rated 10 of them, giving you the pros and cons of each. Runner’s World. 1997;32(3):54-8.
  28. Anbarian M, Ghasemi MH, Sedighi AR, Jalalvand A. Immediate effects of various foot orthoses on lower limb muscles co-contraction during single-leg drop jump. Journal of Advanced Sport Technology. 2019;3(2):32-41.
  29. Wang L, Hong Y, Li JX. Muscular activity of lower extremity muscles running on treadmill compared with different overground surfaces. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. 2014;2(4):161-5.
  30. Falconer K. Quantitative assessment of cocontraction at the ankle joint in walking. Electromyogr clin neurophysiol. 1985;25:135-48.
  31. Nagai K, Yamada M, Uemura K, Yamada Y, Ichihashi N, Tsuboyama T. Differences in muscle coactivation during postural control between healthy older and young adults. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2011;53(3):338-43.
  32. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement: John wiley & sons; 2009.
  33. Grasso R, Zago M, Lacquaniti F. Interactions between posture and locomotion: motor patterns in humans walking with bent posture versus erect posture. Journal of neurophysiology. 2000;83(1):288-300.
  34. Wang R, Gutierrez-Farewik EM. Compensatory strategies during walking in response to excessive muscle co-contraction at the ankle joint. Gait & Posture. 2014;39(3):926-32.
  35. Pinnington HC, Lloyd DG, Besier TF, Dawson B. Kinematic and electromyography analysis of submaximal differences running on a firm surface compared with soft, dry sand. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94(3):242-53.
  36. Apps C, Sterzing T, O'Brien T, Lake M. Lower limb joint stiffness and muscle co-contraction adaptations to instability footwear during locomotion. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2016;31:55-62.
  37. Fok KL, Lee JW, Unger J, Chan K, Musselman KE, Masani K. Co-contraction of ankle muscle activity during quiet standing in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury is associated with postural instability. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):19599.
  38. Mirbagheri M, Barbeau H, Kearney R. Intrinsic and reflex contributions to human ankle stiffness: variation with activation level and position. Experimental Brain Research. 2000;135:423-36.
  39. Sinkjaer T, Toft E, Andreassen S, Hornemann BC. Muscle stiffness in human ankle dorsiflexors: intrinsic and reflex components. Journal of neurophysiology. 1988;60(3):1110-21.
  40. Baratta R, Solomonow M, Zhou B, Letson D, Chuinard R, D'ambrosia R. Muscular coactivation: the role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. The American journal of sports medicine. 1988;16(2):113-22.
  41. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods. 2007;39(2):175-91.
  42. Balazs GC, Pavey GJ, Brelin AM, Pickett A, Keblish DJ, Rue J-PH. Risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury in athletes on synthetic playing surfaces: a systematic review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014;43(7):1798-804.
  43. Azevedo LB, Lambert MI, Vaughan CL, O’Connor CM, Schwellnus MP. Biomechanical variables associated with Achilles tendinopathy in runners. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009;43(4):288.
  44. Orchard JW, Chivers I, Aldous D, Bennell K, Seward H. Rye grass is associated with fewer non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries than bermuda grass. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2005;39(10):704.
  45. Simon R. Review of the impacts of crumb rubber in artificial turf applications. 2010.
  46. van den Berg MEL, Barr CJ, McLoughlin JV, Crotty M. Effect of walking on sand on gait kinematics in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;16:15-21.
  47. Heiden TL, Lloyd DG, Ackland TR. Knee joint kinematics, kinetics and muscle co-contraction in knee osteoarthritis patient gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24(10):833-41.
  48. Riley PO, Paolini G, Della Croce U, Paylo KW, Kerrigan DC. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait & Posture. 2007;26(1):17-24.
  49. Powell DW, Long B, Milner CE, Zhang S. Frontal plane multi-segment foot kinematics in high-and low-arched females during dynamic loading tasks. Human movement science. 2011;30(1):105-14.
  50. Abe D, Muraki S, Yanagawa K, Fukuoka Y, Niihata S. Changes in EMG characteristics and metabolic energy cost during 90-min prolonged running. Gait & posture. 2007;26(4):607-10.
  51. Lloyd DG, Besier TF, Winby CR, Buchanan TS. Neuromusculoskeletal modelling and simulation of tissue load in the lower extremities. Handbook of Biomechanics and Human Movement Science New York: Routledge. 2008:3-17.
  52. Lloyd DG, Buchanan TS. Strategies of muscular support of varus and valgus isometric loads at the human knee. Journal of biomechanics. 2001;34(10):1257-67.
  53. Zeni Jr JA, Higginson JS. Differences in gait parameters between healthy subjects and persons with moderate and severe knee osteoarthritis: a result of altered walking speed? Clinical biomechanics. 2009;24(4):372-8.
  54. Zeni JA, Rudolph K, Higginson JS. Alterations in quadriceps and hamstrings coordination in persons with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology. 2010;20(1):148-54.
  55. Jafarnezhadgero A, Fatollahi A, Amirzadeh N, Siahkouhian M, Granacher U. Ground reaction forces and muscle activity while walking on sand versus stable ground in individuals with pronated feet compared with healthy controls. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0223219.
  56. Durai DBJ, Shaju M. Effect of sand running training on speed among school boys. Int J Phys Educ Sports Health. 2019;6:117-22.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 203
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 189


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب