Improving the Validity of Mixed and Multi-Methods through Triangulation in New Sports Management Research

Pashaie, Sajjad; Abbaszadeh, Mohammad; Abdavi, Fatemeh; Golmohammadi, Hamed

doi:10.22098/rsmm.2023.12593.1216

دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

تعداد نشریات	31
تعداد شماره‌ها	475
تعداد مقالات	4,199
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	7,047,959
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	4,759,719

	Improving the Validity of Mixed and Multi-Methods through Triangulation in New Sports Management Research
Research in Sport Management and Marketing
مقاله 2، دوره 4، شماره 2، خرداد 2023، صفحه 16-27 اصل مقاله (528.43 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22098/rsmm.2023.12593.1216
نویسندگان
Sajjad Pashaie^* ¹؛ Mohammad Abbaszadeh²؛ Fatemeh Abdavi³؛ Hamed Golmohammadi⁴
¹Assistant Professor of Sports Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
²Professor of Social Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
³Associate Professor of Sports Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
⁴Department of Physical Education and Sport, Institute of Health Science, Cumhuriyet University, Sivas.
چکیده
Purpose: The purpose of this research is to improve the validity of mixed and multi-methods through triangulation in sports management research. Methods: In terms of the research design, the current research is a new method research combining several quantitative and qualitative methods and developing tools in mixed and multi-methods, and triangulation and, is evaluation research in terms of practical purpose and orientation. Results: Usually, mixed methods are used to identify the underlying categories of the studied phenomenon, then, in the quantitative phase, a pattern is designed based on the identified categories. Multimethod research is an attempt to combine research methods to address a particular research problem. Multi-methods promise new insights and perspectives in the understanding of phenomena in sports management research. In the mixed method, to a certain extent, the limitation of the selection is proposed methodologically; A limitation that is somewhat seen with multi-methods. Not only does triangulation have no such limitation, but it is broader than the two cases mentioned as it acts as a tool kit for researchers to help understand and explain the subject under study. Conclusion: Therefore, from this point of view, triangulation is more comprehensive than the two methods mentioned, and in the period of late modernity and postmodernity, which emphasizes the new pragmatism, triangulation seems to have a wide range of applications.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Methodology؛ Mixed and Multi-methods؛ Triangulation

مراجع
Alavi, H., & Hąbek, P. (2016). Addressing research design problem in mixed methods research. Management Systems in Production Engineering. https://doi.org/10.12914/MSPE-10-01-2016 Alise, M. A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of mixed methods research, 4(2), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809360805 Andrew, D. P., Pedersen, P. M., & McEvoy, C. D. (2019). Research methods and design in sport management. Human Kinetics. Bhandari, P. (2022). Triangulation in Research \| Guide, Types, Examples. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/triangulation/ Bhandari, P. (2023). Triangulation in Research \| Guide, Types, Examples. Retrieved Published on January 3, 2022 from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/triangulation/ Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods ((5th ed.)). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Boudreau, M.-C., Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2001). Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS quarterly, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250956 Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906290531 Carugi, C. (2016). Experiences with systematic triangulation at the Global Environment Facility. Evaluation and Program Planning, 55, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.12.001 Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455-472). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012174698-8/50045-X Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative. Quantitative, and mixed methods. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications. Creswell, J. W., Fetters, M. D., & Ivankova, N. V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. The Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.104 Doyle, L., Brady, A.-M., & Byrne, G. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of research in nursing, 14(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/0.1177/1744987108093962 Driessnack, M. (2006). Draw-and-tell conversations with children about fear. Qualitative health research, 16(10), 1414-1435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306294127 Fassinger, R., & Morrow, S. L. (2013). Toward best practices in quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method research: A social justice perspective. Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology, 5(2), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.33043/JSACP.5.2.69-83 Fusch, P., Fusch, G. E., & Ness, L. R. (2018). Denzin’s paradigm shift: Revisiting triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Sustainable Social Change, 10(1), 2. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2016). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813349 Gorard, S., & Taylor, C. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Green, J. (2008). Assessing satisfaction: Insights from a multi-methods study. Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554-561. Halverson, S. L. (2017). Multimethod approaches. The handbook of translation and cognition, 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch11 Hesse-Biber, S. N., Bailey-Rodriguez, D., & Frost, N. (2015). A qualitatively driven approach to multimethod and mixed methods research. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.013.3 Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Johnson, R. B. (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.013.13 Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224 Kaplan, B., & Duchon, D. (1988). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study. MIS quarterly, 571-586. https://doi.org/10.2307/249133 King, K. A., & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology in second language studies: Trends, concerns, and new directions. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12309 Knappertsbusch, F., Langfeldt, B., & Kelle, U. (2021). Mixed-methods and multimethod research. Soziologie-Sociology in the German-Speaking World, 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110627275-018 Krathwohl, D. R. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. Longman/Addison Wesley Longman. Lewis, J. R. (2018). Measuring perceived usability: The CSUQ, SUS, and UMUX. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(12), 1148-1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1418805 Mackey, A., & Bryfonski, L. (2018). Mixed methodology. The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology, 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_5 Martha, D., Sousa, V. D., & Mendes, I. A. C. (2007). An overview of research designs relevant to nursing: Part 3: Mixed and multiple methods. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 15, 1046-1049. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000500025 McKendrick, J. H. (2020). Mixed and multiple methods. In International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 125-131). Elsevier. https://doi.org/0.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10291-4 Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega, 25(5), 489-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(97)00018-2 Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative health research, 8(3), 362-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800307 Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 1, 189-208. Newman, I., Benz, C. R., & Ridenour, C. S. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. SIU Press. O'Cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2007). Integration and publications as indicators of" yield" from mixed methods studies. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(2), 147-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806299094 Palvia, P., Leary, D., Mao, E., Midha, V., Pinjani, P., & Salam, A. F. (2004). Research
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,993 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,066

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

آمار

Improving the Validity of Mixed and Multi-Methods through Triangulation in New Sports Management Research