آمار

تعداد نشریات26
تعداد شماره‌ها326
تعداد مقالات2,803
تعداد مشاهده مقاله4,227,622
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله2,881,153
Komijani, A., Kheradmandi, M., Sedighizadeh, M.. (1402). Optimal Allocation and Control of Superconducting Fault Current Limiter and ‎Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage in Mesh Microgrid Networks to ‎Improve Fault Ride Through. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(1), 22-32. doi: 10.22098/joape.2023.9577.1668
A. Komijani; M. Kheradmandi; M. Sedighizadeh. "Optimal Allocation and Control of Superconducting Fault Current Limiter and ‎Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage in Mesh Microgrid Networks to ‎Improve Fault Ride Through". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11, 1, 1402, 22-32. doi: 10.22098/joape.2023.9577.1668
Komijani, A., Kheradmandi, M., Sedighizadeh, M.. (1402). 'Optimal Allocation and Control of Superconducting Fault Current Limiter and ‎Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage in Mesh Microgrid Networks to ‎Improve Fault Ride Through', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 11(1), pp. 22-32. doi: 10.22098/joape.2023.9577.1668
Komijani, A., Kheradmandi, M., Sedighizadeh, M.. Optimal Allocation and Control of Superconducting Fault Current Limiter and ‎Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage in Mesh Microgrid Networks to ‎Improve Fault Ride Through. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 11(1): 22-32. doi: 10.22098/joape.2023.9577.1668

Optimal Allocation and Control of Superconducting Fault Current Limiter and ‎Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage in Mesh Microgrid Networks to ‎Improve Fault Ride Through

Journal of Operation and Automation in Power Engineering
دوره 11، شماره 1، تیر 2023، صفحه 22-32    اصل مقاله (2.91 M)
نوع مقاله: Research paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22098/joape.2023.9577.1668
نویسندگان
A. Komijani؛ M. Kheradmandi؛ M. Sedighizadeh*
Department of Electrical Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Evin, Tehran, Iran.‎
چکیده
Voltage drop during the fault can be effected on the performance of generation units such as wind turbines. The ability to ride through the fault is important for these generation units. Superconducting fault current limiter and superconducting magnetic energy storage can improve the fault ride through due to fault current limiting and voltage restoring ability during the fault, respectively. This paper presents a method for optimal allocation and control of superconducting magnetic energy storage and superconducting fault current limiters in meshed microgrids. For this purpose, the doubly-fed induction generator voltage deviation, the point of common coupling power deviation, the fault current of transmission lines, and superconducting fault current limiter and superconducting magnetic energy storage characteristics were considered as objective functions. In this paper, the optimization is performed in single-step and two-step by particle swarm optimization algorithm, and the system with the optimal superconducting magnetic energy storage and superconducting fault current limiters are analyzed and compared. The results of simulations show superconducting fault current limiter and superconducting magnetic energy storage reduce 85% of voltage drop, decreases 63% of doubly fed induction generator power deviation, and limits the maximum fault current of transmission lines by 9.8 pu. Finally, the status of the studied system variables has been investigated, in two scenarios related to the different fault locations with equipment that the optimal allocated.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Meshed Microgrid؛ superconducting fault current limiter؛ superconducting magnetic energy storage؛ Optimization
مراجع
  1. Mohamed, M. Salama., “A review on the proposed solutions to microgrid protection problems”, Proc. CCECE, 2016.
  2. North America Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), “Performance of Distributed Energy Resources During and After System Disturbance Voltage and Frequency Ride-Through Requirements”, A report by the Integration of Variable Generation Task Force (Task 1-7), 2013.
  3. Zhan et al., “Relay protection coordination integrated optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation sources in distribution networks”, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 7, pp. 55-65, 2016.
  4. Khan et al., “Application and positioning analysis of a resistive type superconducting fault current limiter in AC and DC microgrids using simulink and simpowersystem”, Proc. 1st ICEPE-ST, 2011.
  5. Overbeeke, “Fault current source to ensure the fault level in inverter-dominated networks”, 20th CIRED, 2009.
  6. Huang et al., “An impedance protection scheme for feeders of active distribution networks”, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, pp. 1591-1602, 2014.
  7. Laaksonen, D. Ishchenko, and A. Oudalov, “Adaptive protection and microgrid control design for hailuoto island”, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, pp. 1486-93, 2014.
  8. Farhadi-Kangarlu, F. Mohammadi, “Performance improvement of single-phase transformerless grid-connected PV inverters regarding common-mode voltage (CMV) and LVRT”, J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., vol. 7, pp. 1-15, 2019.
  9. Mohammadi et al., “Design of A single-phase transformerless grid-connected PV inverter ‎considering reduced leakage current and LVRT grid codes”, J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., vol. 9, pp. 49-59, 2021.
  10. Blair et al., “Analysis of energy dissipation in resistive superconducting fault-current limiters for optimal power system performance”, IEEE Trans. App. Supercond., vol 21, pp. 3452-57, 2011.
  11. Faried, and M. Elsamahy, “Incorporating superconducting fault current limiters in the probabilistic evaluation of transient recovery voltage”, IET Gen., Trans. Dist., vol 5, pp. 101-107, 2011.
  12. Lei et al., “Comparison of superconducting fault current limiter and dynamic voltage restorer for LVRT improvement of high penetration microgrid”, IEEE Trans. App. Supercond., vol. 27, pp. 1-7, 2017.
  13. Nakayama et al., “Micro power grid system with SMES and superconducting cable modules cooled by liquid hydrogen”, IEEE Trans. App. Supercond., vol. 19, pp. 2062-5, 2009.
  14. Molina and P. Mercado, “Power flow stabilization and control of microgrid with wind generation by superconducting magnetic energy storage”, IEEE Trans. Power Elec., vol. 26, pp. 910-922, 2011.
  15. Xiao et al., “Cooperative rotor-side SMES and transient control for improving the LVRT capability of grid-connected DFIG-based wind farm”, IEEE Trans. App. Supercond., vol. 29, pp. 1-5, 2019.
  16. Yu et al., “Optimal location and sizing of fault current limiters in mesh networks using iterative mixed integer nonlinear programming”, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 31, pp. 4776-83, 2016.
  17. Kim, H. Jo, and S. Joo, “Analysis of impacts of superconducting fault current limiter (SFCL) placement on distributed generation (DG) expansion”, IEEE Trans. App. Supercond., vol. 26, pp. 1-5, 2016
  18. Wang et al., “Improvement of operating performance for the wind farm with a novel CSC-Type wind turbine-SMES hybrid system”, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 28, pp. 693-703, 2013.
  19. Lei et al., “Coordinated control of SFCL and SMES for transient performance improvement of microgrid with multiple DG units”, Canadian J. Elect. Comp. Eng., vol. 39, pp. 158-67, 2016.
  20. Ngamroo, “Optimization of SMES-FCL for augmenting FRT performance and smoothing output power of grid-connected DFIG wind turbine”, IEEE Trans. App. Supercond., vol. 26, pp. 1-5, 2016.
  21. Rajashekar et al., “Coordinated control of optimized SMES and SFCL for the improvement of power system transient stability”, Proc. ICEEOT, 2016.
  22. Stalin, S. Senthil Kumar, and K. Fathima, “Coordinated control of UPFC with SMES and SFCL for improvement of power system transient stability”, Proc. Sec. ICONSTEM, 2016.
  23. Heier, “Grid integration of wind energy: onshore and offshore conversion systems”, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2014
  24. Noorolah, S. Soleymani, F. Faghihi, “Voltage sag investigation of microgrid in the presence of SMES and SVC”, Sig. Proc. Renew. Eng., vol. 3, pp. 23-34, 2019.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 854
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 900


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب