آمار

تعداد نشریات27
تعداد شماره‌ها355
تعداد مقالات3,091
تعداد مشاهده مقاله4,568,680
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله3,119,931
Jabbari Oranj, Fatemeh, Naghizadeh-Baghi, Abbas, Nobakht, Farzad. (1400). The Effect of Sport Consumer’s Hostility on Purchasing Intention in Original and Copycat Brands. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 2(3), 12-27. doi: 10.22098/rsmm.2021.1350
Fatemeh Jabbari Oranj; Abbas Naghizadeh-Baghi; Farzad Nobakht. "The Effect of Sport Consumer’s Hostility on Purchasing Intention in Original and Copycat Brands". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 2, 3, 1400, 12-27. doi: 10.22098/rsmm.2021.1350
Jabbari Oranj, Fatemeh, Naghizadeh-Baghi, Abbas, Nobakht, Farzad. (1400). 'The Effect of Sport Consumer’s Hostility on Purchasing Intention in Original and Copycat Brands', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 2(3), pp. 12-27. doi: 10.22098/rsmm.2021.1350
Jabbari Oranj, Fatemeh, Naghizadeh-Baghi, Abbas, Nobakht, Farzad. The Effect of Sport Consumer’s Hostility on Purchasing Intention in Original and Copycat Brands. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 2(3): 12-27. doi: 10.22098/rsmm.2021.1350

The Effect of Sport Consumer’s Hostility on Purchasing Intention in Original and Copycat Brands

Research in Sport Management and Marketing
دوره 2، شماره 3، آذر 2021، صفحه 12-27    اصل مقاله (699.89 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22098/rsmm.2021.1350
نویسندگان
Fatemeh Jabbari Oranj1؛ Abbas Naghizadeh-Baghi2؛ Farzad Nobakht2
1MA of Sport Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2Associate Professor of Sport Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
چکیده
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the situational and stable hostility of Ardabil sports consumers and its effect on the intention to buy in the original brands and Nike copycats.
Methods: This study was a descriptive cross-sectional study and the statistical population consists of all athletes of different disciplines in Ardabil. The sampling method was multi-stage and to determine the sample size, the Cochran formula of unlimited community was used and the sample size was 385 people. Moradi and Zarei (2011), and Jalilvand et al (2011) questionnaires were used to assess the purchase intention and by examining the tools of Klein et al (1998), Nijsen and Douglas (2004), Atenson and Klein (2005), Hassanzadeh and Meshbaki Esfahani (2015), questions related to hostility were prepared according to the historical memory and events of Iran. SPSS24 and Smart PLS3 software were used to answer the research questions.
Results: The results showed that in athletes, both situational and stable hostility have a negative and significant effect on the intention to buy the main Nike brand. In the case of the copycat brand, the effect of stable hostility on the intention to buy was positive and significant, but the situational hostility of athletes had no effect on their intention to buy Nike Copycat.
Conclusion: Situational and stable hostility of consumers towards the United States negatively the intention to buy the original Nike brand.

کلیدواژه‌ها
Keyword: Stable hostility؛ Situational hostility؛ Purchasing intention؛ Original brand؛ Copycat brand
مراجع
References

  1. Abraham, V. (2013). Does consumer animosity impact purchase involvement? an empirical investigation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(1), 1-1.
  2. Abraham, V. (2013). A cross-cultural investigation of the effect of consumer animosity on purchase involvement. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(4), 32-44.
  3. Ang, S. H., Jung, K., Kau, A. K., Leong, S. M., Pornpitakpan, C., & Tan, S. J. (2004). Animosity towards economic giants: what the little guys think. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(3), 190–207.
  4. Arami, F., Kheyri, B. (2017). Investigate the characteristics of hostility and ethnicity to buy a customer. Second International Conference on Management Coherence and Economics in Development, Osweh University, Tehran, Iran.
  5. Baha'i, M., Pesyani, M. (2009). Are Iranian consumers poised to "buy American in a hostile bilateral environment, Business Horizons, 52(3), 223-232.
  6. Bakhshan, M. Mohammadifard, A., & Abedi, H. (2016). Investigating the Impact of Hostility, Ethnicity and Mental Norms of Iranian Consumers on Evaluation and Willingness to Buy American Products. The first national conference on global management and economics, University of Knowledge and Culture, Tehran, Iran.
  7. Gonzalez, C. C., Trelles, A. K. (2021). Consumer ethnocentrism and purchasing intention in developing countries. Journal of Science in Administration and Economics, 11(21), 165-179.
  8. Dehdashti, Sh. Z., Kahyari, H. A., & Otoufi, A. (2014). Identifying the factors affecting the intention to buy goods with foreign brands in Iran. Brand Management Quarterly, 1(1), 99-75.
  9. Ebrahimi, M. (2020). Investigating the effect of consumer hostility towards the country of production and the image of the country of origin on the intention to buy. Journal of New Resrarch Accounting, 4(39), 61-72.
  10. Ebrahimi, B., Ketabiyan, H., & Rahimi, H. (2015). Identifying effective criteria for selecting an imitateon brand in consumer goods. Business Management, 7(2), 294-273.
  11. Fakharmanesh, S., Ghanbarzadeh, M. R. (2012). Buying foreign goods: the role of brand image, ethnicity and hostility. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 6(1), 145-160.
  12. Firoozian, F., Bahar al-Ulum, H., & Dehghanpour, H. (2020). The Impact of Social Media Marketing on Customer Value and Repurchase Intent Sports shops. Research of Sponsorship Management and Sport Marketing, 1(2), 149-174.
  13. Hasanzadeh, M., Meshbaki Esfahani, A. (2016). Model-Structure Test of Customer Hostility on the Prohibition of Pilgrimage and Tourism to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in Tehran. Journal of Modern Marketing Research, 6(4), 66-53.
  14. Jalilvand, M. R., Samiei, N., & Mahdavinia, S. M. (2011). The effect of brand equity components on purchase intention: an application of Aaker’s model in the automobile industry. International Business and Management, 2(2), 149-158.
  15. Jung, K., Ang, S. H., Leong, S. M., Tan, S. J., Pornpitakpan, C., &  Kau, A. K. (2002). A typology of animosity and its cross-national validation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(6), 525–539.
  16. Kesic, T., Pirirajh, P., & Vlasic, G. (2005). The role of nationalism in consumer ethnocentrism and the animosity in the post-war country. 34th European Marketing Conference, Bocconi University, Milano, Italy.
  17. Klein, J. G., Smith, N. G., & John, A. (2002). Exploring motivations for participation in a consumer boycott. Advances in Consumer Research, 29(1), 363–369.
  18. Klein, J., Ettenson, R. D., & Morris, D. (1998). The animosity of model of foreign product purchase: an empirical test in the people's republic of china. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 89-100.
  19. Koh, D. (2014). Consumer animosity following international crisis: a conceptual framework to understand indonesian consumers’ attitude towards Australian products. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(10), 1833-8119.
  20. Lai, K.Y., Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1999). Brand imitation: Do the Chinese have different view. Asia pacific journal of management, 16(2), 179-192.
  21. Mansouri, M., Kordnaiej, A., & Khodadad Hosseini, H. (2016). The effect of consumption values on purchase intention. Organizational Resource Management Research, 6(4), 171-188.
  22. Meymandi, E., Bakhshandeh, Gh. (2018). Investigating the effect of ethnocentrism on shopping intention with the mediating role of consumer hostility, social status and self-confidence. Pars Manager Quarterly, 3(11).
  23. Miceli, G., Pieters, R. (2010). Looking more or less alike: determinants of perceived visual similarity between copycat and leading brands. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1121-1128.
  24. Mitchell, V. W., Kearney, I. (2002). A critique of legal measures of brand confusion. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 11(6), 357–379.
  25. Mohammadkhani, S. (2018). Brand identity. Fourth International Conference on Management, Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, Takestan Higher Education Institute, Qazvin, Iran.
  26. Moharramzadeh, M., & Fattah Modarres, S. (2017). Principles and foundations of sports branding. Mohaghegh Ardabili University Press.
  27. Moradi, H., Zarei, A. (2011). The impact of brand equity on purchase intention and brand preference-the moderating effects of country of origin image. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(3), 539-545.
  28. Naderi, B. M., Adibzadeh, M., & Dehghani, Gh. A.( 2015). The Impact of Innovation on Electronic Purchasing Intention Using Structural Equation Modeling. Business Management Quarterly, 7(4), 941-966.
  29. Nijssen, E., Douglas, S. (2004). Eexamining the animosity model in a country with a high level of foreign trade. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 23-38.
  30. Nisco, A., Mainolfi, G., Marino, V., & Napolitano, M. R. (2015). Effect of economic animosity on consumer ethnocentrism and product-country images: a binational study on perception of Germanyduring the Euro crisis. European Management Journal, 34(1), 59-68.
  31. Rahimnia, F. Hadadiyan, A. & Dorugar, A. (2016). The effect of brand love on the intention to buy through brand loyalty. 7th International Conference on Management and Accounting, Management and 4th International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Open Innovation, Tehran, Iran.
  32. Ritchie, W. J., Kirche, E., & Fornaciari, C. J. (2007). An exploration of students perceptions of strategic management model usefulness. Journal of applied business research, 23(2), 31-46.
  33. Sarkar, S., & Rawani, M. (2017). Consumers’ responses to private labels: evaluations extrinsic cues imitations. Advances in National Branding and Private Label Marketing.
  34. Shahangian, B., Abdalvand, B. M., & Khounsiyavash, M. (2019). Factors affecting the permanent and temporary hostility of Iranian consumers towards Arab countries and its consequences on judging the quality and willingness to buy foreign products, Business Management, 11(41), 174-145.
  35. Shin, M. (2001). The animosity of model of foreign product purchase revisited: does it work in Korea. Journal of Empirical Generalization in Marketing Science, 6(1), 6-14.
  36. Shirkhodai, M., Nouripoor, A. H., & Rezaie, S. (2014). Explain the role of brand-related factors and selected elements of marketing mix in the intention to buy a national brand. Journal of Brand Management, 1(1), 127-156.
  37. Sweden, N., Ladhari, R., & Chang, L. (2018). Chinese perception and willingness to buy Taiwanese brands: The role of ethnocentrism and animosity. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(4), 816-836.
  38. Statements of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution in the large gathering of pilgrims and neighbors of Hazrat Reza (AS) in the holy city of Mashhad, 2000.
  39. Su, S. (2006). Consumer evaluations of brand imitations- An investigation. MBA dissertation, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
  40. Tavousi, S., Shakm, A. M. (2017). Explaining the concept of factors affecting consumer behavior: A review study. The first national conference on management with the approach of resistance economy, Abadeh Islamic Azad University, Fars, Iran.
  41. Tomasevic, D., Gasevic, D., & Vranjes, M. (2020). Factors Affecting Consumers' Intention to Buy Foreign Brands - An Empirical Survey in Serbia. Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies.
  42. Van Horen, F., Pieters, R. (2012). Consumer evaluation of copycat brands: The effect of imitation type. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(3), 246- 255.
  43. Yuce, A. (2014). The role of Consumer hostility and Consumer ethnocentrism on the intention of buying foreing goods: a case study on Iranian, Turkhish and Azerbijani consumers. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(12), 38-55.
  44. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2006). The psychology behind trademark infringement and counterfeiting. Edition of Ilustrada, Psychology Press.
  45. Zare, Sh., Ebrahimi, A. (2018). Identifying the factors affecting the consumer's intention to buy in the domestic market (review study). Fourth International Conference on Management, Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, Takestan Higher Education Institute, Qazvin.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 367
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 287


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب