آمار

تعداد نشریات26
تعداد شماره‌ها306
تعداد مقالات2,643
تعداد مشاهده مقاله3,968,138
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله2,673,033
Hakimi Poor, Mahsa, Minoonejad, Hooman, Rajabi, Reza, Mousavi, Seyed Hamed. (1401). Validity of the Most Common Footprint Indices in Measuring Medial Longitudinal Arch in Comparison with a Radiographic Method as a Gold Standard. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6(1), 86-95. doi: 10.22098/jast.2022.1781
Mahsa Hakimi Poor; Hooman Minoonejad; Reza Rajabi; Seyed Hamed Mousavi. "Validity of the Most Common Footprint Indices in Measuring Medial Longitudinal Arch in Comparison with a Radiographic Method as a Gold Standard". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6, 1, 1401, 86-95. doi: 10.22098/jast.2022.1781
Hakimi Poor, Mahsa, Minoonejad, Hooman, Rajabi, Reza, Mousavi, Seyed Hamed. (1401). 'Validity of the Most Common Footprint Indices in Measuring Medial Longitudinal Arch in Comparison with a Radiographic Method as a Gold Standard', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 6(1), pp. 86-95. doi: 10.22098/jast.2022.1781
Hakimi Poor, Mahsa, Minoonejad, Hooman, Rajabi, Reza, Mousavi, Seyed Hamed. Validity of the Most Common Footprint Indices in Measuring Medial Longitudinal Arch in Comparison with a Radiographic Method as a Gold Standard. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1401; 6(1): 86-95. doi: 10.22098/jast.2022.1781

Validity of the Most Common Footprint Indices in Measuring Medial Longitudinal Arch in Comparison with a Radiographic Method as a Gold Standard

Journal of Advanced Sport Technology
دوره 6، شماره 1، تیر 2022، صفحه 86-95    اصل مقاله (743.35 K)
نوع مقاله: Original research papers
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22098/jast.2022.1781
نویسندگان
Mahsa Hakimi Poor؛ Hooman Minoonejad؛ Reza Rajabi؛ Seyed Hamed Mousavi*
Department of Health and Sports Medicine, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) of the foot is a controversial issue in orthopedics. Using footprint parameters is considered as the most common method to evaluate MLA. Present study aimed to determine validity of footprint indices in measuring medial longitudinal arch in comparison with radiography method. Forty-one subjects were randomly selected. Footprints were recorded in static bipedal standing position using ink and paper. Arch index, footprint index, Chippaux-Smirak index, and Staheli index were calculated from the footprints. Also, calcaneal inclination, calcaneal-first metatarsal, talo-calcaneal angles and navicular height were obtained from lateral feet radiographs as a golden standard method for evaluating the static posture of the foot. All measurements of footprints and radiographs were calculated by a technique in computerized image analysis based on Adobe Photoshop software. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine validation. Results showed a strong relationship between the values of footprint indices and calcaneal inclination angle, calcaneal-first metatarsal angle and talo-calcaneal angle obtained from radiography (r=0.56 to 0.72). The highest correlation coefficient (r = 0.72) was observed between Staheli index and calcaneal inclination angle and the lowest correlation coefficient (r=0.56) was between the arch index and calcaneal inclination angle whereas no significant relationship was found between footprint indices and navicular height obtained from radiography. Analysis of footprint indices had an acceptable validity in measuring the medial longitudinal arch. Therefore, this method is recommended to be used as a valid, non-invasive, quick, cost-effective and accurate method for measuring MLA.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Acceptability؛ Foot arch؛ Measurement؛ X-ray؛ Pronation
مراجع
  1. Xiong, S., R.S. Goonetilleke, C.P. Witana, T.W. Weerasinghe, and E.Y.L. Au, Foot arch characterization: a review, a new metric, and a comparison. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2010; 100(1):14-24.
  2. Tong, J.W. and P.W. Kong, Association between foot type and lower extremity injuries: systematic literature review with meta-analysis. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2013; 43(10): 700-714.
  3. Neal, B.S., I.B. Griffiths, G.J. Dowling, G.S. Murley, S.E. Munteanu, M.M. Franettovich Smith, et al., Foot posture as a risk factor for lower limb overuse injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of foot and ankle research. 2014: 7(1): 1-13.
  4. Hillstrom, H.J., J. Song, A.P. Kraszewski, J.F. Hafer, R. Mootanah, A.B. Dufour, et al., Foot type biomechanics part 1: structure and function of the asymptomatic foot. Gait & posture. 2013; 37(3): 445-451.
  5. Pita-Fernandez, S., C. Gonzalez-Martin, F. Alonso-Tajes, T. Seoane-Pillado, S. Pertega-Diaz, S. Perez-Garcia, et al., Flat foot in a random population and its impact on quality of life and functionality. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2017; 11(4): LC22.
  6. Shih, Y.-F., C.-Y. Chen, W.-Y. Chen, and H.-C. Lin, Lower extremity kinematics in children with and without flexible flatfoot: a comparative study. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2012; 13(1): 1-9.
  7. Prachgosin, T., D.Y. Chong, W. Leelasamran, P. Smithmaitrie, and S. Chatpun, Medial longitudinal arch biomechanics evaluation during gait in subjects with flexible flatfoot. Acta of bioengineering and biomechanics. 2015; 17(4): 121--130.
  8. Anzai, E., K. Nakajima, Y. Iwakami, M. Sato, S. Ino, T. Ifukube, et al., Effects of foot arch structure on postural stability. Clinical Research on Foot & Ankle. 2014; 15: 1-5.
  9. Beelen, P.E., I. Kingma, P.A. Nolte, and J.H. van Dieën, The effect of foot type, body length and mass on postural stability. Gait & Posture. 2020; 81: 241-246.
  10. Menz, H.B., A.B. Dufour, J.L. Riskowski, H.J. Hillstrom, and M.T. Hannan, Foot posture, foot function and low back pain: the Framingham Foot Study. Rheumatology. 2013; 52(12): 2275-2282.
  11. Nielsen, R.O., I. Buist, E.T. Parner, E.A. Nohr, H. Sørensen, M. Lind, et al., Foot pronation is not associated with increased injury risk in novice runners wearing a neutral shoe: a 1-year prospective cohort study. British journal of sports medicine. 2014; 48(6): 440-447.
  12. Yalçin, N., E. Esen, U. Kanatli, and H. Yetkin, Evaluation of the medial longitudinal arch: a comparison between the dynamic plantar pressure measurement system and radiographic analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010; 44(3): 241-5.
  13. Zuil-Escobar, J.C., C.B. Martínez-Cepa, J.A. Martín-Urrialde, and A. Gómez-Conesa, Evaluating the medial longitudinal arch of the foot: correlations, reliability, and accuracy in people with a low arch. Physical Therapy. 2019; 99(3): 364-372.
  14. Hameed, N., N. Baseer, Z. Huma, S. Javed, T. Raza, and A. Sadaf. Anthropometric Assessment Of Paediatric Flat Foot: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC. 2020; 32(3): 359-367.
  15. Pita-Fernández, S., C. González-Martín, T. Seoane-Pillado, B. López-Calviño, S. Pértega-Díaz, and V. Gil-Guillén. Validity of footprint analysis to determine flatfoot using clinical diagnosis as the gold standard in a random sample aged 40 years and older. Journal of epidemiology. 2015: JE20140082.
  16. Queen, R.M., N.A. Mall, W.M. Hardaker, and J.A. Nunley. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system. Foot & ankle international. 2007; 28(4): 456-462.
  17. Chen, C.-H., M.-H. Huang, T.-W. Chen, M.-C. Weng, C.-L. Lee, and G.-J. Wang. The correlation between selected measurements from footprint and radiograph of flatfoot. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2006; 87(2): 235-240.
  18. Murley, G.S., H.B. Menz, and K.B. Landorf. A protocol for classifying normal-and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements. Journal of foot and ankle research. 2009; 2(1): 1-13.
  19. Nikolaidou, M. and K. Boudolos. A footprint-based approach for the rational classification of foot types in young schoolchildren. The Foot. 2006; 16(2): 82-90.
  20. Villarroya, M.A., J.M. Esquivel, C. Tomás, L.A. Moreno, A. Buenafé, and G. Bueno, Assessment of the medial longitudinal arch in children and adolescents with obesity: footprints and radiographic study. European journal of pediatrics, 2009. 168(5): 559-567.
  21. Sacco, I.C., A.N. Onodera, K. Bosch, and D. Rosenbaum, Comparisons of foot anthropometry and plantar arch indices between German and Brazilian children. BMC pediatrics. 2015; 15(1): 1-6.
  22. Kanatli, U., H. Yetkin, and E. Cila, Footprint and radiographic analysis of the feet. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2001; 21(2): 225-228.
  23. Gutierrez-Vilahu, L., N. Masso-Ortigosa, L. Costa-Tutusaus, and M. Guerra-Balic, Reliability and validity of the footprint assessment method using Photoshop CS5 Software. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association. 2015; 105(3): 226-232.
  24. Menz, H.B. and S.E. Munteanu, Validity of 3 clinical techniques for the measurement of static foot posture in older people. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2005; 35(8): 479-486.
  25. Mall, N.A., W.M. Hardaker, J.A. Nunley, and R.M. Queen, The reliability and reproducibility of foot type measurements using a mirrored foot photo box and digital photography compared to caliper measurements. Journal of biomechanics. 2007; 40(5): 1171-1176.
  26. Jonely, H., J.-M. Brismée, P.S. Sizer Jr, and C.R. James, Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking. Clinical Biomechanics. 2011; 26(8): 873-879.
  27. van Melick, N., B.M. Meddeler, T.J. Hoogeboom, M.W. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, and R.E. van Cingel, How to determine leg dominance: The agreement between self-reported and observed performance in healthy adults. PloS one. 2017; 12(12): e0189876.
  28. Roni, S.M., M.K. Merga, and J.E. Morris, Conducting quantitative research in education. 2020: Springer.
  29. Cavanagh, P.R. and M.M. Rodgers. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. Journal of biomechanics. 1987; 20(5): 547-551.
  30. Zuil-Escobar, J.C., C.B. Martínez-Cepa, J.A. Martín-Urrialde, and A. Gómez-Conesa, Medial longitudinal arch: accuracy, reliability, and correlation between navicular drop test and footprint parameters. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 2018; 41(8): 672-679.
 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 445
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 398


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب