آمار

تعداد نشریات31
تعداد شماره‌ها472
تعداد مقالات4,152
تعداد مشاهده مقاله6,935,125
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله4,680,591
Abdualsada Alshebaney, Emad Jadeen, Farhadi-Kangarlu, Mohammad, Talavat, Vahid. (1405). Novel Electricity Pricing Method Based on the Customers’ Risk Aversion Function. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(3), 154-164. doi: 10.22098/joape.2024.14882.2139
Emad Jadeen Abdualsada Alshebaney; Mohammad Farhadi-Kangarlu; Vahid Talavat. "Novel Electricity Pricing Method Based on the Customers’ Risk Aversion Function". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14, 3, 1405, 154-164. doi: 10.22098/joape.2024.14882.2139
Abdualsada Alshebaney, Emad Jadeen, Farhadi-Kangarlu, Mohammad, Talavat, Vahid. (1405). 'Novel Electricity Pricing Method Based on the Customers’ Risk Aversion Function', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 14(3), pp. 154-164. doi: 10.22098/joape.2024.14882.2139
Abdualsada Alshebaney, Emad Jadeen, Farhadi-Kangarlu, Mohammad, Talavat, Vahid. Novel Electricity Pricing Method Based on the Customers’ Risk Aversion Function. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1405; 14(3): 154-164. doi: 10.22098/joape.2024.14882.2139

Novel Electricity Pricing Method Based on the Customers’ Risk Aversion Function

Journal of Operation and Automation in Power Engineering
مقاله 1، دوره 14، شماره 3، آبان 2026، صفحه 154-164    اصل مقاله (1.4 M)
نوع مقاله: Research paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22098/joape.2024.14882.2139
نویسندگان
Emad Jadeen Abdualsada Alshebaney؛ Mohammad Farhadi-Kangarlu* ؛ Vahid Talavat
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
چکیده
Electricity pricing approaches are generally categorized into flat-rate and dynamic pricing models. Flat-rate pricing charges a fixed rate regardless of market conditions, whereas dynamic pricing adjusts rates based on system and market factors. Traditional pricing methods often lack flexibility, preventing consumers from choosing their preferred pricing plans. This study introduces a Selective Electricity Pricing (SEP) model that allows customers to select a Maximum Tolerable Price (MTP) tailored to their needs and benefit from Real-Time Pricing. The SEP model also includes a retailer-funded mechanism to shield customers from high market prices, acting as a risk hedge. Using a risk aversion function to gauge consumer preferences, the SEP method was implemented on the IEEE-24 test system. Results indicate that low-risk customers are more likely to engage in dynamic pricing. The SEP model significantly outperforms flat-rate pricing, yielding 17.27% higher retailer profits, 11.32% lower demand, and a 2.73% increase in average customer payments, compared to a 2,500MW drop under flat-rate pricing.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Retailer؛ electricity pricing؛ risk aversion function؛ electricity market
مراجع
  1. D. Shah and S. Chatterjee, “A comprehensive review on day-ahead electricity market and important features of world’s major electric power exchanges,” Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst., vol. 30, no. 7, p. e12360, 2020.
  2. www.PJM.com.
  3. C. Oliveira, D. F. Botelho, T. Soares, A. S. Faria, B. H. Dias, M. A. Matos, and L. W. de Oliveira, “Consumercentric electricity markets: A comprehensive review on user preferences and key performance indicators,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 210, p. 108088, 2022.
  4. N. L. Hall, T. D. Jeanneret, and A. Rai, “Cost-reflective electricity pricing: Consumer preferences and perceptions,” Energy Policy, vol. 95, pp. 62–72, 2016.
  5. J. Zethmayr and D. Kolata, “The costs and benefits of real-time pricing: An empirical investigation into consumer bills using hourly energy data and prices,” Electr. J., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 50–57, 2018.
  6. K. Uehara, S. Sekizaki, I. Nishizaki, and T. Hayashida, “A study for retailer’s risk hedge considering responses of consumers in electricity deregulation,” in 2015 IEEE 8th Int. Workshop Comput. Intell. Appl., pp. 167–172, IEEE, 2015.
  7. Q. Zhang and X. Wang, “Hedge contract characterization and risk-constrained electricity procurement,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1547–1558, 2009.
  8. B. K. Jack, K. McDermott, and A. Sautmann, “Multiple price lists for willingness to pay elicitation,” J. Dev. Econ., vol. 159, p. 102977, 2022.
  9. E. Haktanır and C. Kahraman, “Intuitionistic fuzzy risk adjusted discount rate and certainty equivalent methods for risky projects,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 257, p. 108757, 2023.
  10. C. A. Holt and S. K. Laury, “Risk aversion and incentive effects,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1644–1655, 2002.
  11. R. Faia, T. Pinto, Z. Vale, and J. M. Corchado, “Portfolio optimization of electricity markets participation using forecasting error in risk formulation,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 129, p. 106739, 2021.
  12. E. Dütschke and A.-G. Paetz, “Dynamic electricity pricing—which programs do consumers prefer?,” Energy Policy, vol. 59, pp. 226–234, 2013.
  13. H. Taherian, I. Nazer, E. Razavi, S. Goldani, M. Farshad, and M. Aghaebrahimi, “Application of an improved neural network using cuckoo search algorithm in short-term electricity price forecasting under competitive power markets,” J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 136–146, 2007.
  14. M. Krishnan and S. Gupta, “Political pricing of electricity– can it go with universal service provision?,” Energy Policy, vol. 116, pp. 373–381, 2018.
  15. J. Correia-da Silva, I. Soares, and R. Fernández, “Impact of dynamic pricing on investment in renewables,” Energy, vol. 202, p. 117695, 2020.
  16. C. Eid, E. Koliou, M. Valles, J. Reneses, and R. Hakvoort, “Time-based pricing and electricity demand response: Existing barriers and next steps,” Utilities Policy, vol. 40, pp. 15–25, 2016.
  17. K. Mitra and G. Dutta, “A two-part dynamic pricing policy for household electricity consumption scheduling with minimized expenditure,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 100, pp. 29–41, 2018.
  18. M. Shen and J. Chen, “Optimization of peak-valley pricing policy based on a residential electricity demand model,” J. Cleaner Prod., vol. 380, p. 134761, 2022.
  19. J. Yang, J. Zhao, F. Wen, and Z. Dong, “A model of customizing electricity retail prices based on load profile clustering analysis,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3374–3386, 2018.
  20. H. J. Monfared and A. Ghasemi, “Retail electricity pricing based on the value of electricity for consumers,” Sustainable Energy Grids Networks, vol. 18, p. 100205, 2019.
  21. M. J. Blaschke, “Dynamic pricing of electricity: Enabling demand response in domestic households,” Energy Policy, vol. 164, p. 112878, 2022.
  22. H. Rashidizadeh-Kermani, H. R. Najafi, A. AnvariMoghaddam, and J. M. Guerrero, “Optimal decision making framework of an electric vehicle aggregator in future and pool markets,” J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 157–168, 2018.
  23. M. Ambrosius, J. Egerer, V. Grimm, and A. H. van der Weijde, “Risk aversion in multilevel electricity market models with different congestion pricing regimes,” Energy Econ., vol. 105, p. 105701, 2022.
  24. G. Meunier, “Risk aversion and technology mix in an electricity market,” Energy Econ., vol. 40, pp. 866–874, 2013.
  25. C. Fraunholz, K. K. Miskiw, E. Kraft, W. Fichtner, and C. Weber, “On the role of risk aversion and market design in capacity expansion planning,” Energy J., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 111–138, 2023.
  26. J. C. Do Prado and U. Chikezie, “A decision model for an electricity retailer with energy storage and virtual bidding under daily and hourly cvar assessment,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 106181–106191, 2021.
  27. R. Pérez-Santalla, M. Carrión, and C. Ruiz, “Optimal pricing for electricity retailers based on data-driven consumers’ price-response,” Top, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 430–464, 2022.
  28. H. J. Monfared and A. Ghasemi, “Retail electricity pricing based on the value of electricity for consumers,” Sustainable Energy Grids Networks, vol. 18, p. 100205, 2019.
  29. E. V. Hobman, E. R. Frederiks, K. Stenner, and S. Meikle, “Uptake and usage of cost-reflective electricity pricing:
    Insights from psychology and behavioural economics,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., vol. 57, pp. 455–467, 2016.
  30. G. Goyal and S. Vadhera, “Solution to objectives of supply side energy management by integrating enhanced demand response strategy,” J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 269–279, 2024.
  31. A. Niromandfam and S. P. Choboghloo, “Modeling electricity demand, welfare function and elasticity of electricity demand based on the customers risk aversion behavior,” ArXiv Preprint PrXiv:2010.07600, 2020.
  32. D. Ecike Ewanga, “Decision making and risk aversion under uncertainty in energy renewable and operational of flexibility of distribution system network,” ISSN 2004-2965, vol. 36, 2024.
  33. E. Çanakoglu and E. Adıyeke, “Comparison of electricity˘ spot price modelling and risk management applications,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 4698, 2020.
  34. J. Khorasani and H. R. Mashhadi, “A risk-based bidding strategy in an electricity multimarket,” in 2011 19th Iran. Conf. Electr. Eng., pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2011.
  35. N. C. Martin and B. Fanzeres, “A stochastic risk-averse model to price energy in pool-based electricity markets with non-convex costs and revenue caps,” in 2023 Int. Conf. Smart Energy Syst. Technol., pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2023.
  36. D. Wang, R. Wu, C. S. Lai, X. Li, X. Wu, J. Wei, Y. Xu, and L. L. Lai, “Interactive energy management for networked microgrids with risk aversion,” in 2019 IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern., pp. 2231–2236, IEEE, 2019.
  37. P. Coto-Millán and P. Coto-Millán, “Theory of utility and consumer behaviour: a comprehensive review of concepts, properties and the most significant theorems,” Util. Prod.: Theory Appl., pp. 7–23, 1999.
  38. S. Mohajeryami, P. Schwarz, and P. T. Baboli, “Including the behavioral aspects of customers in demand response model: Real time pricing versus peak time rebate,” in 2015 N. Am. Power Symp., pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2015.
  39. K. Ma, G. Hu, and C. J. Spanos, “Dynamics of electricity markets with unknown utility functions: An extremum seeking control approach,” in 11th IEEE Int. Conf. Control Autom., pp. 302–307, IEEE, 2014.
  40. A. Niromandfam, P. Karimizare, M. Sheikh-El-Eslam, and M. Haghifam, “Distribution network upgrading base on expected utility by using insurance model,” in CIRED 2012 Workshop: Integr. Renewables Distrib. Grid, pp. 1–4, IET, 2012.
  41. M. O. Rieger, “Optimal financial investments for non-concave utility functions,” Econ. Lett., vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 239–240, 2012.
  42. R. Kaas, M. Goovaerts, J. Dhaene, and M. Denuit, “Utility theory and insurance,” Mod. Actuarial Risk Theory: Using R, pp. 1–16, 2008.
  43. L. Mastroeni and M. Naldi, “Network protection through insurance: Premium computation for the on-off service model,” in 2011 8th Int. Workshop Des. Reliab. Commun. Networks, pp. 46–53, IEEE, 2011.
  44. R. Kaas, M. Goovaerts, and J. Dhaene, Modern actuarial risk theory. Springer Sci. Bus. Media, 2008.
  45. P. T. Baboli, M. Eghbal, M. P. Moghaddam, and H. Aalami, “Customer behavior based demand response model,” in 2012 IEEE Power Energy Soc. Gener. Meet., pp. 1–7, IEEE, 2012.
  46. H. Aalami, M. P. Moghaddam, and G. Yousefi, “Demand response modeling considering interruptible/curtailable loads and capacity market programs,” Appl. Energy, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 243–250, 2010.
  47. I. Alger and C.-t. A. Ma, “Moral hazard, insurance, and some collusion,” J. Econ. Behav. Organ., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 225–247, 2003.
  48. C.-L. Su and D. Kirschen, “Quantifying the effect of demand response on electricity markets,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1199–1207, 2009.
  49. P. M. Subcommittee, “Ieee reliability test system,” IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., no. 6, pp. 2047–2054, 1979.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 526
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 325


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب