آمار

تعداد نشریات27
تعداد شماره‌ها364
تعداد مقالات3,223
تعداد مشاهده مقاله4,740,954
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله3,238,375
Kordloo, Hossein, Nobakht Sareban, Farzad. (1400). The Effect of Online Classes on Student Satisfaction: A Case Study of Physical Education Students. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 2(4), 1-11. doi: 10.22098/rsmm.2022.1403
Hossein Kordloo; Farzad Nobakht Sareban. "The Effect of Online Classes on Student Satisfaction: A Case Study of Physical Education Students". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 2, 4, 1400, 1-11. doi: 10.22098/rsmm.2022.1403
Kordloo, Hossein, Nobakht Sareban, Farzad. (1400). 'The Effect of Online Classes on Student Satisfaction: A Case Study of Physical Education Students', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 2(4), pp. 1-11. doi: 10.22098/rsmm.2022.1403
Kordloo, Hossein, Nobakht Sareban, Farzad. The Effect of Online Classes on Student Satisfaction: A Case Study of Physical Education Students. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 2(4): 1-11. doi: 10.22098/rsmm.2022.1403

The Effect of Online Classes on Student Satisfaction: A Case Study of Physical Education Students

Research in Sport Management and Marketing
مقاله 1، دوره 2، شماره 4، اسفند 2021، صفحه 1-11    اصل مقاله (339.93 K)
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22098/rsmm.2022.1403
نویسندگان
Hossein Kordloo1؛ Farzad Nobakht Sareban2
1Ph.D. Student of Sport Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2Associate Professor of Sport Management, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
چکیده
Purpose: The COVID-19 epidemic forced the education system to enter a new era of online education. The distance learning model has absorbed new experiences that require the transfer of activity planning from the traditional format to the online format. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of online classes on the satisfaction of physical education students.
Method: The present study was an applied and correlational study that was conducted in the field. The statistical population of the present study consisted of physical education students across the country. G-power software was used to estimate the statistical sample. For this purpose, using Non-probability Sampling method, 490 questionnaires were collected among physical education students online through WhatsApp and Telegram to collect data. In this study, descriptive statistics and inferential statistics including Pearson correlation and multiple regression at the alpha level of 0.05 were used. SPSS software was used to analyze the data.
Results: The findings of the present study indicate that all components of online classes were significant predictors of physical education students' satisfaction. Among the components of online classes, Instructor’s Prompt Feedback was the highest (0.20) and Student’s Expectations (0.14) was the lowest predictor of student satisfaction.
Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, in using e-learning as a platform for online classes, it is necessary to place more emphasis on components such as quick feedback that satisfies students. On the other hand, we should not ignore the components that had less effect on student satisfaction.
کلیدواژه‌ها
online classes؛ satisfaction؛ student؛ physical education
مراجع
References

  1. Agarwal, S., & Kaushik, J. S. (2020). Student’s perception of online learning during COVID pandemic. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 87(7), 554-554.
  2. Almaiah, M. A., & Almulhem, A. (2018). A conceptual framework for determining the success factors of e-learning system implementation using Delphi technique. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96(17), 5962-5976.
  3. Almaiah, M. A., & Alyoussef, I. Y. (2019). Analysis of the effect of course design, course content support, course assessment and instructor characteristics on the actual use of E-learning system. Ieee Access, 7, 171907-171922.
  4. Almusharraf, N., & Khahro, S. (2020). Student's satisfaction with online learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(21), 246-267.
  5. Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(3), 285-292.
  6. Bali, S., & Liu, M. C. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1108, No. 1, p. 012094). IOP Publishing.
  7. Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching. The internet and higher education, 7(3), 217-232.
  8. Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).
  9. Bokayev, B., Torebekova, Z., Davletbayeva, Z., & Zhakypova, F. (2021). Distance learning in Kazakhstan: estimating parents’ satisfaction of educational quality during the coronavirus. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1-13.
  10. Brown, S. A., Venkatesh, V., & Goyal, S. (2014). Expectation confirmation in information systems research. Mis Quarterly, 38(3), 729-A9.
  11. Butnaru, G. I., Niță, V., Anichiti, A., & Brînză, G. (2021). The Effectiveness of Online Education during Covid 19 Pandemic—A Comparative Analysis between the Perceptions of Academic Students and High School Students from Romania. Sustainability, 13(9), 5311.
  12. Chen, T., Peng, L., Jing, B., Wu, C., Yang, J., & Cong, G. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on user experience with online education platforms in China. Sustainability, 12(18), 7329.
  13. Choe, R. C., Scuric, Z., Eshkol, E., Cruser, S., Arndt, A., Cox, R. ... & Crosbie, R. H. (2019). Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(4), ar55.
  14. Cross, L. K. (2018). Graduate student perceptions of online advising. NACADA Journal, 38(2), 72-80.
  15. Farsi, Z., Aliyari, S., Ahmadi, Y., Afaghi, E., & Sajadi, S. A. (2021). Satisfaction of the Quality of Education and Virtual Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Nursing Students of Aja University of Medical Sciences in 2020. Journal of Military Medicine, 23(2), 174-185. (persian)
  16. Fatani, T. H. (2020). Student satisfaction with videoconferencing teaching quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-8. (persian)
  17. Gold, S. (2001). A constructivist approach to online training for online teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 35-57.
  18. Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19. Education and Information Technologies, 1-25.
  19. Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning.
  20. Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning.
  21. Joseph, M., Yakhou, M., & Stone, G. (2005). An educational institution's quest for service quality: customers’ perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(1):66-82.
  22. Li, C., & Lalani, F. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is How (2020).
  23. Manee, F. M. (2013). Testing of social-cognitive model of academic satisfaction in undergraduate students. Journal of Psychology, 17(2):201- 219.
  24. O’Donovan, B. (2017). How student beliefs about knowledge and knowing influence their satisfaction with assessment and feedback. Higher Education, 74(4), 617-633.
  25. Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students’ expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & education, 54(1), 222-229.
  26. Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2623-2656.
  27. Salloum, S. A. S. (2018). Investigating students' acceptance of E-learning system in Higher Educational Environments in the UAE: Applying the Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Doctoral dissertation, The British University in Dubai).
  28. Shehzadi, S., Nisar, Q. A., Hussain, M. S., Basheer, M. F., Hameed, W. U., & Chaudhry, N. I. (2020). The role of digital learning toward students' satisfaction and university brand image at educational institutes of Pakistan: a post-effect of COVID-19. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 276–294.
  29. Simsek, U., Turan, I., & Simsek, U. (2017). Social studies teachers‟ and teacher candidates” perceptions on prompt feedback and communicate high expectations. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 332.
  30. Song, H., Kim, J., & Luo, W. (2016). Teacher–student relationship in online classes: A role of teacher self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 436-443.
  31. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & education, 50(4), 1183-1202.
  32. Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A. B., & Alsinani, M. (2019). E-learning system of UCOM for improving student assessment feedback in Oman higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1311-1335.
  33. UNESCO, U. (2020). COVID-19 educational disruption and response. UNESCO.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,427
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 785


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب